XPost: alt.startrek, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.startrek.current   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: weberm@polaris.net   
      
   starfist@gmail.invalid wrote:   
   >On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:21:41 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:   
   >>liam@valentijn.nu wrote:   
   >>>Op 26-6-2017 om 19:46 schreef Ubiquitous:   
   >>>> starfist@gmail.invalid wrote:   
      
   >>>>> I wonder if the reason women are forbidden to command a starship in   
   >>>>> Krik's era has anything to do with the disaster that is brewing for   
   >>>>> this series.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Didn't we learn anything from Voyager?   
   >>>   
   >>>Voyager had issues orbiting issues. The gender of Janeway was not part   
   >>>of that. It was the writers. They failed.   
   >>   
   >> If memory serves, they made a big deal about having a female captain   
   >   
   >The PR push was annoying, but they didn't have to upend anything to   
   >write the character.  At least the timeline worked. Kirk says that   
   >women are forbidden to captain a sharship 10 years after Discover   
   >takes place. Not a problem for Voyager.   
      
   But that wasn't the point. the point is they made a big deal about finally   
   having a female Captain and she was a miserable failure, proving the point of   
   them not allowing female captains.   
      
   --   
   Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd   
   have to audit liberals  & wire tap reporters' phones.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)