XPost: alt.startrek, rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current   
   From: liam@valentijn.nu   
      
   Op 28-6-2017 om 04:07 schreef Obveeus:   
   >   
   >   
   > On 6/27/2017 4:09 PM, Jim G. wrote:   
   >> Obveeus sent the following on 06/27/2017 at 06:58 AM:   
   >   
   >>> For whatever reason, the plot point never made it into the film.   
   >>   
   >> Weird. If I had to guess, I'd guess that there was a problem with the   
   >> admiral actor or the admiral actress or both. I mean, if it was a time   
   >> issue, it's not as if they couldn't have shaved a bit of the pretty   
   >> CGI overkill   
   >   
   > Are you talking about the universe's largest lice infestation?  (the   
   > bazillion glowing white 'dots')   
   >   
   >> All I know is that I was very disappointed with that first effort.   
   >> Very disappointed. Lots of things and people to point fingers at,   
   >> including a rusty cast that was years removed from working together as   
   >> actors. And it showed. In the end, it's why I've always been such a   
   >> fan of Nicholas Meyer for his work as director and uncredited   
   >> screenwriter on II. For my money, and despite II's own flaws, he saved   
   >> Trek.   
   >   
   > I agree that WRATH OF KHAN was a much better film...and, for that   
   > matter, the best TREK film made.   
   >   
      
   I'm partial to Star Trek III myself. :-)   
      
   --   
   Wouter Valentijn www.j3v.net   
      
   "Be yourself no matter what they say"   
      
   Sting ("Englishman in New York")   
      
   liam=mail   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)