home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.tv.star-trek      William Shatner told 'em to get a life      5,051 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,898 of 5,051   
   Ubiquitous to me@sc1f1dan.com   
   Re: [Overlord DVD] Is Section 31 the Wor   
   09 Jan 25 12:53:58   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv, alt.startrek, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   XPost: rec.arts.startrek.misc   
   From: weberm@polaris.net   
      
   In article <87msg0s0wf.fsf@rpi3>, me@sc1f1dan.com wrote:   
   > "Ian J. Ball"  writes:   
   >> On 1/8/25 3:40 AM, Daniel wrote:   
   >>> Ubiquitous  writes:   
      
   >>>> Star Trek Section 31 is "not the Trek fans want" according to actor Rob   
   >>>> Kazinsky who publicly confessed he's "terrified" by how fans are going   
   >>>> to react to this latest series from Secret Hideout.  Was this public   
   >>>> confession damage control from Paramount, or maneuvering behind the   
   >>>> scenes by Skydance? Here's what Kazinsky said, along with some   
   >>>> allegations leaked by a long-time source from behind the scenes, but   
   >>>> from what I'm hearing folks, as strange as it seems, Section 31 may well   
   >>>> be the WORSTEST Star Trek EVAR! #startrek #paramount #paramountplus   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://youtu.be/1yP9hIPuE6o?si=m6ogu5uKRmw26B8O   
   >>>   
   >>> Hard to beat STD in horribleness.   
   >>   
   >> Hard to beat ST:V in horribleness!!   
   >   
   > Agreed, that movie was. indeed, a turd fanned by impossibly high shatner   
   > ego.   
      
   I believe he was referring to Voyager.   
      
   --   
   Not a joke! Don't jump!   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca