XPost: alt.tv.nypd-blue, alt.tv.andromeda, alt.tv.lois-n-clark   
   From: frosty@frigid.com   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:MPG.1bfcf262d863723e98971a@news.blueyonder.co.uk...   
   > In article ,   
   > frosty@frigid.com says...   
   > > As distasteful as it is, I agree. The problem is, the other choice would   
   be   
   > > to vote for someone that supports killing approximately 1,370,000   
   innocent   
   > > babies EVERY YEAR. Most of us chose the lesser of two evils.   
   > >   
   >   
   > strange comment I dont understand...   
   >   
   > but the best option is to make a point of not voting when none of the   
   > candidates are acceptable   
      
   1,370,000 babies are aborted (killed before birth) each year in the US. Over   
   133,000 of them are after the baby would likely live if born that early.   
      
   By the way, I favor women's choice. She should CHOOSE to keep her legs   
   closed or use contraception, not kill a victim of a STUPID CHOICE.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)