From: nothingv@coxnospam.net   
      
   "Sean Carroll"  wrote in   
   news:488e58fc$0$4040$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net:   
      
   > "lynx"  wrote   
   >   
   >> And I do recommend one see it at least twice.   
   >   
   > Ditto. (Not Lynn.)   
   >   
   > I just got back from my second viewing. This time, without all the   
   > unrealistic expectations I had the first time, it struck me as a   
   > pretty damn good story. I enjoyed it much more the second time, when I   
   > knew what to expect.   
   >   
      
      
   I was also able to enjoy it a lot more the second time around. I think I   
   was pretty anxious & a bit nervous about what they were going to do w/it   
   & how the whole thing would turn out. I really didnt want to be   
   disappointed!  I missed some things the first time round that I caught   
   w/ease on second viewing, & I was better able to really pay attention to   
   all the little nuances in the script & story. I think it was a *very*   
   good script. Im very impressed w/it & cant wait to see it again.   
      
   One slightly funny bit I havent seen anyone mention...when M & S are out   
   on the 2nd search effort & Scully is telling him to let it go, then   
   Mulder yells that they need the men back. Scully says, "What are you   
   doing?" & Mulder replies, "Im TRYING to ignore you". Good stuff!   
      
   One thing I didnt really get...why the bleeding eyes? Was there an   
   explanation that I missed?   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)