XPost: alt.alien.research, alt.paranet.ufo, alt.alien.visitors   
   From: jyanjyan@rocketmail.com   
      
   On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:22:35 +1200, Sir Gilligan Horry   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:19:52 -0700, John Ayres   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>Wouldn't it be practical to develop a system that is the   
   >>non-terrestrial based equivalent to Sonar or Radar? You would scan for   
   >>objects, and then, once an object was detected using this scanning   
   >>system, its size, mass, density, speed would be calculated, its   
   >>location would be triangulated, its direction, and any other factors   
   >>that would be needed to keep track of this object in a database would   
   >>also be determined. Then it would stay in the database, with periodic   
   >>update checks on its location, along with periodic update checks on   
   >>everything else in the database.   
   >>   
   >>That would be the beginings of a working system for mapping out   
   >>everything in our universe.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Yes, that and other systems to see and find and track moving objects   
   >of any size.   
   >   
   >Do you study about Quantum Physics ?   
      
   No. I've never been one inclined to study. I have a learning disorder.   
   I have to think things through, and it takes time to digest new   
   information.   
      
   >Or should I say, have you seen these two DVDs ...   
   >   
   >1.   
   >What the Bleep Do We Know?! DVD.   
   >   
   >2.   
   >Down The Rabbit Hole DVD.   
      
   No. Sorry. I'm not familiar with either.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)