XPost: alt.alien.research, alt.paranet.ufo, alt.alien.visitors
From: mr.hvac@gmail.com
John. Please answer this question seriously,
since I am doing a study of UFO believers.
Q- Have you ever committed any homosexual acts?
Please answer honestly. All answers will be held
in the strictest of confidence.
"John Ayres" wrote in message
news:8ha256h1a3tftphhufr0buapkrk6ja7jn1@4ax.com...
> Now that the extremely wealthy gentleman, and his group of people who
> developed that prototype self sustaining space craft have handed over
> all the technologies to the Chinese, as was in the agreements, and now
> that the U.S.A. has also received all the information on this, along
> with their own modified version of a perpetually sustaining space
> craft, the U.S. government is free to build and test more of these
> craft, and modify them as they so desire.
>
> What does this mean?
>
> To the average person, it means little to nothing. However, to the
> so-called "enemies of the state", firstly, the Muslim Jihadhists, it
> means, their time is limited.
>
> Nextly, we must wonder, who is an enemy of the state, the state being,
> the U.S.A.? Well, prohibition seems to be a point of interest for some
> people who live with puritan values. So that means, all drug users,
> and drug dealers are all enemies of the state. Fortunately, however,
> not too much can be done to this group, as opposed to the Muslim
> Jihadists, as this group speaks English, or Spanish, and fortunately
> for them, they are not in the business of picking up Ak-47's to waste
> American GI's as are the groups of Muslim Jihadists. However, if we go
> south of the border, there are plenty of Southerners, i.e., Mexicanos,
> who would love to pick up an Ak-47 and waste a north Americaner,
> regardless of race, color, or ethnic background.
>
> That's means, on the list of enemies of the state, we have at the no.
> 1 spot, the Muslim Jihadhists. At the no. 2 spot, we have our southern
> brothers and sisters.
>
> This seems not quite right.
>
> The point to bring out here, is, the U.S.A., now with their
> perpetually sustaining space craft will want to do things with it,
> other than nuke Muslim Jihadists, and if they get a chance, nuke a
> southern brother or sister.
>
> They will want a long term goal for putting the perpetually sustaining
> space craft to its best use, and right now, that "Best Use" scenario
> happens to be surveilance of others.
>
> Wall Street technologies companies with expertise in this area will be
> glad to hear that.
>
> The U.S.A. needs to be better able to take out the perceived "enemies
> of the state", so emphasis on survielance will go up, in the war rooms
> at the White House and at the Pentagon, and research and development
> into how to best "deactivate" an enemy of the state, that is, kill him
> or her, will also be emphasised.
>
> Well, they can't yet nuke persons with anti-american sentiment, but
> they certainly can have fun testing their systems for improved
> surveilance of these people.
>
> With that said, I think we can look forward to days, weeks, months,
> and years ahead of us, wherein we may see a strong shift to focusing
> more on persons with anti-american sentiment.
>
> We can also look forward to seeing news anchor persons putting more
> emphasis on persons who commit crimes that could have been thwarted
> had they just been surveiled a little more closely.
>
> We can also look forward to a straight out denial of any thing that
> goes by the name of or is in anyway related to what is known as, or
> what I call anyway, a perpetually sustaining space craft.
>
> John
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
