8d9ff069
XPost: alt.alien.research, alt.paranet.ufo, alt.alien.visitors
From: GM@ga7rm5er.com
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:45:00 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:
>On Aug 13, 1:42 am, John wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 3:27 am, John Ayres wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:50:30 -0700, John Ayres
>>
>> > wrote:
>> > >On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:17:53 -0700, John Ayres
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > >>What if, everything that exists possesses a quality or feature and we
>> > >>can call that feature gravity and it is constantly pulling inwardsly,
>> > >>exerting a force on everything outside. Now, if we learn how to switch
>> > >>the pulling force gravity, and switch it around so it is a pushing
>> > >>force, and then directionalize it, we could get that directionable
>> > >>pushing force. We can call this pushing force, Anti-gravity.
>>
>> > >>Then, all there is to do is to find the best alloy that will push with
>> > >>the greatest force with the least bit of energy applied. Further
>> > >>testing could be done to see if it can't be directionalized.
>>
>> > >>Once you learn how to directionalize it, all there is to do is to find
>> > >>a way to regulate it, that is the intensity by which force is
>> > >>directionalized outwardsly.
>>
>> > >>Finally, install it in your carriage, with all the gear you'll need to
>> > >>get it to run self-sufficiently, sit in your cockpit, then turn it on,
>> > >>and up you go.
>>
>> > >>With similar and duplicate systems built into the carriage, with the
>> > >>right configuration, you can get the carriage to hoover, spin, reverse
>> > >>spin, accelerate, and basically, move through the atmosphere.
>>
>> > >>So, they've found a way to do exactly that. Big deal, right? Big deal.
>> > >>Yes!
>>
>> > >>That's what those guys were doing back in 1971, over in the
>> > >>Shenendoha(sp?) mountains, testing out their new little anti-gravity
>> > >>machine. Well, now we have, idf's, or identified flying objects. :)
>>
>> > >>Gosh. The Darla Starship has come a long way since 1971 and they've
>> > >>added a few things, as well, It seems.
>>
>> > >>John Ayres
>>
>> > >>"I am but a child on a shoreline of a vast lake of unanswered
questions."
>>
>> > >>Issac Newton
>>
>> > >Basic Reverse Gravitational Stunts
>>
>> > >Reversing an object's gravity, can give you eye blinding speeds.
>>
>> > >By reversing an object's gravity, you can do those kinds of stunts
>> > >where the whole object, and it's gravitational environment, which
>> > >includes you, by the way, can take off, and zip away together at
>> > >speeds that go by you in a blink of an eye.
>>
>> > >The question that needs to be answered is, how do you reverse an
>> > >object's gravity?
>>
>> > >John Ayres
>>
>> > Do you know those artificial magnets, the large ones that they attach
>> > to the end of a crane, and then useing some kind of circuitry, they
>> > turn the metal plate into a huge magnet and they pick up cars, and put
>> > the cars into crushers with them?
>>
>> > Whatever the circuitry is to turn the metal plate into a huge magnet,
>> > something in that circuitry can be switched around so that it does not
>> > produce a "pulling" magnet, but it produces an opposite, or "pushing"
>> > magnet. That pushing magnet would be reverse gravity or, anti-gravity,
>> > wouldn't it?
>>
>> > Anyone know the answer?
>>
>> > If so, if a "pushing" magnet were produced, all you would need to do
>> > is increase the intensity of the current until the plate began to show
>> > signs of lifting off from the ground. Say, for example, you place it
>> > on a metal plate, it will begin to lift itself off the metal plate,
>> > eventually, won't it?
>>
>> > John Ayres
>>
>> I guess if you mess around with the circuitry on these magnets, the
>> best you could come up with is something that will float on a rail
>> like a levitation train. Merely messing with those circuits aren't
>> going to get you anywhere.
>>
>> Not to change the subject, but did you notice on one of those
>> Discovery Channel shows, they talked about how salt and sugar in a
>> vacuum and in a zero gravity environment, will accrete together. They
>> said, that's how all the planets came together, through accretion.
>>
>> That means, there is a force inside of every molecule, and that force
>> is a pulling force. That pulling force leads to accretion.
>>
>> Now. We have to reverse the pulling force, possibly. If there were a
>> way to reverse the pulling force, then you would have an "anti-
>> gravity" environment, wouldn't you?
>>
>> In other words, the pulling force is normally, in our universe,
>> pulling in one direction.
>>
>> Which direction it is pulling in, once it is in a zero gravity
>> environment, I don't know, but it may be pulling in a counter-
>> clockwise direction.
>>
>> Which direction it is pulling in, once it is in a earth, for example,
>> gravitational environment, may well be the opposite, that is,
>> clockwise.
>>
>> I say this based on observation. If this is true, then why the
>> difference? Is it that under normal planetary gravitational
>> environments magnetism has something to do with this? And under
>> normal, zero gravity environmental factors, there has not been enough
>> magnetism built up to influence the direction of turn or spin?
>>
>> In a normal gravitational environment, if there were some way to
>> negate the magnetic influence, would that release us so that the spin
>> would be counter clockwise?
>>
>> With this counter clockwise spin, would it be possible to set up a
>> whole new mini gravitational environment?
>>
>> In this mini gravitational environment, so long as we maintained this
>> reverse spin, or direction of spin, which is counter clockwise, would
>> it be possible to achieve what the Seans achieved, and apparently what
>> the Chinese achieved?
>>
>> There has got to be something missing in there, because it can't be
>> just a question of spin. Some kind of force must be applied with a
>> spin that will make a reverse magnetic environment, reverse to the
>> earth, and other planets.
>>
>> Under this new environment, it may be possible for the first time to
>> produce a significant anti-gravity environment.
>>
>> If this is true or not, I have no idea. They are just ideas. But some
>> ideas are better than no ideas.
>>
>> One day we'll learn how the Seans did it.
>>
>> John Ayres
>
>Sorry. I said salt and sugar in a vacuum. It's not in a vacuum, it's
>just in a zero gravity environment.
>
>See ya,
>
>John Ayres
Love, Wisdom, Respect, and Dignity !
___
.
.
.
.
.
___
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
