Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.ufo.reports    |    The latest from planet crackpot    |    8,965 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,130 of 8,965    |
|    MrPostingRobot@kymhorsell.com to All    |
|    NAZI UFO's (1/2)    |
|    29 Dec 20 12:34:03    |
      XPost: alt.paranet.ufo              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:       - Patterns relating weather conditions in Antarctica and frequency of        UFO sightings 1900-1999 suggest "something" changed around 1950.       - Rather than supporting the idea that the correlation between        Antarctic weather and UFO sightings increased suddenly around the        end of WWII, perhaps because escaped Nazi scientists set up a base        on the continent, the data suggests patterns that had been in        operation 1900-1950 suddenly stopped and were replaced by "quieter"        relationships between sightings and more remote areas of the        continent and nearby deep ocean.              In prev posts I've looked at how the e.g. spacial distribution of UFO       sightings can hint at properties of the underlying phenomena. E.g. we       can determine that ufo sightings in the US seem to be influenced by       the placement of military bases, particularly AFB. Different "types"       of UFO almost all seem to fall off in density toward larger       concentrations of AFB. Some objects fall off in proportion to the       distance from concentrations of AFB, some fall off faster, some slower.              But now let's look at the *time* distribution of sightings and see if       we can answer an old question -- are UFO's operated by Nazi scientists       who escaped Germany toward the end of WWII and set up shop at some       base in Antarctica?              Some simple twiddling will confirm there is some kind of affinity       between monthly UFO sightings and conditions in the Antarctic. Some       of the relevant "explanation powers" (R2) are reasonably large. The       exact chain of causation is ambiguous and can range from weather       conditions created in the SoPo blowing debris around the US that are       mistaken for strange objects in the sky, through some kind of aircraft       based in Antarctica travel more readily between there and the Americas       depending on "local" weather conditions.              To answer the Nazi UFO question we need to look at how the correlation       between Antarctica-related weather and UFO sightings changed over the       20th century. Was there some change around WWII and, if so, does it       suggest UFO's started to originate from Antarctica? Or does something       else seem to have happened?              To fill in some more background that might influence the reader's       thinking we need to note that rumours of an Antarctic Nazi base       started to circulate shortly after Germany lodged a claim for part of       the continent during the 30s. After invading parts of Scandinavia the       Nazi govt attempted to annexe part of Norway's claim to Antarctica.       After the war both the UK and US sent military expeditions down there       to check the rumors out. I'm not familiar with all the ins and outs       but some of what I've read indicate both expeditions tended to       concentrate on the Antarctic Peninsula presumably given its relative       proximity to S America (perhaps in particular Argentina).              So given all these various nebulous facts, what do we expect?       If water temperatures off the Antarctic coast seem to predict UFO       sightings in the US over the 20th cent, do we expect this relationship       increased suddenly around the end of WWII or do we expect it decreased?              I would argue if UFO's are supposed to originate at a base in       Antarctica set up in the 1940s and operating ever since then we should       *expect* the correlation between conditions in the Antarctic and UFO       sightings e.g. in the US should suddenly have increased around the end       of WWII. Maybe they rose and fell a bit since then, but there should       be a much higher correlation after the "setup of the base" than beforehand.              Given the paucity of some of the data below it all has to be handled       very carefully we don't introduce any biases. I use a s/w package that       tries to "homogenise" (i.e. remove bias) from data its given using       various mostly simple techniques. Using the UFO sighting data from the       NUFORC database it took the monthly numbers from 1900-2000 and       "ironed" them to account for changes in US population, changes in       methodology, and missing data (which predominantly lives in the period       1900-1950 in this exercise).              Missing data in particular is a worry. There are numerous methods to       estimate missing data. But we can't use them here. "Guessing" at data       that is otherwise missing will tend to introduce noise and make       correlations smaller. If there is more missing data in the 1900-50       period than in the 1950-2000 period then we are biasing the result --       we are reducing the correlations for the 1st 1/2 of the 20th cent in       relation to those in the 2nd half. And this would give us a false result.              So the s/w does not estimate missing values at all. It only uses the       numbers we have measured. And this in itself leads to more       complications for statistical tests, but the s/w is supposed to be       able to handle that.              So the table we get is thus:              data correlation (R2) between data and NUFORC monthly ufo sightings        c20 1930-50 1950-70       ocean-60dep1000 0.0368426 nil 0.164162 *       ant160 0.0316147 0.107255 0.0693065       ant140 0.0276233 0.833305 0.0843708       lat-80 0.0271078 0.29937 0.00621208       arc-90 0.0267563 nil 0.00938717 *       ant150 0.0264957 0.097701 0.0813875       ant130 0.0253734 0.128925 0.042244       ocean-80dep0 0.0251416 nil 0.00988108 *       ant170 0.022851 0.16174 0.0561528       stormseg-90 0.0221058 0.0888908 0.00833896       ant-160 0.0219791 0.175104 0.0156734       ant-150 0.0217034 0.205564 0.0188159       ant-170 0.0185683 0.206246 0.0181962       arc-80 0.0183147 nil 0.029617 *       ant-10 0.017503 0.0637775 nil       ant100 0.0173873 0.122475 0.0186838       ant60 0.0169002 0.086368 0.0223843       ant-180 0.01664 0.233454 0.0217722       ant0 0.016411 0.0676842 nil       ant-140 0.0160485 0.232104 0.0155224       ant10 0.0160342 0.0879714 0.00575712       ocean-70dep1000 0.0157767 0.0860524 0.0153943       ant40 0.0155558 nil 0.0338617 *       ocean-60dep0 0.0152184 nil 0.0131574 *       lat-70 0.0145588 0.124074 0.0213232       ant90 0.01445 0.0931583 0.0415367       ant-20 0.0142866 0.0805802 0.00665689       ocean-60dep10 0.0140117 nil 0.00841425 *       ant80 0.0134908 0.0701346 0.0262705       ant110 0.0133603 0.122092 0.0215954       ant-130 0.0133318 0.215073 0.0135993       ant20 0.013225 0.122794 0.0113221       ant-80 0.0129412 0.158483 0.0092757       ocean-70dep1 0.012267 nil 0.0123914 *       ant30 0.0120639 0.0949931 0.0158063       ant50 0.0120521 0.0425647 0.0297215       ocean-70dep500 0.0119995 0.131864 0.0203876              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca