From: jimmyw836@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, January 30, 2021 at 5:56:39 PM UTC-5, R Kym Horsell wrote:   
   > Jimmy Wilhelmssohn  wrote:    
   > > ...short stature, as in 3' or 4' tall, no apparent sex organs, wimpy arms   
   and legs, big heads with no hair, slits for mouths and two little holes for   
   noses.....   
   > Doesn't sound typical.    
   >    
   > With only about 5% of UFO reports being accurate or even    
   > meaningful, we probably need to expect reports of "contacts" are    
   > about as reliable.    
   >    
   > Webb & Bloecher have cataloged reports of contact with    
   > "unusual humanoids" from the 19th cent to the late 1970s.    
   >    
   > Suspiciously the average height reported comes in at 5.8 ft.    
   > (The last decade from the catalog give:    
   > Height Number    
   > 3-4 ft 3    
   > 4-5 ft 2    
   > 5-6 ft 5    
   > 6-7 ft 5    
   > 7-8 ft 5    
   > 8-10 ft 3    
   > ).    
   >    
   > It seems people can not imagine "aliens" that look much different from    
   > themselves.    
   >    
   > Like Star Trek! :)    
   >    
   > We might suspect anying too far outside narrow human-like parameters is    
   > essentially "invisible".    
   >    
   > In the 19th cent people used to see "air ships" rather than disks or   
   triangles.    
   > Typically, a newspaper report would say someone heard voices from the sky,    
   > looked up and there was an airship.    
   >    
   > An airship would sometimes supposedly stop over someone's home, the crew    
   > would come down and borrow a pail of water or something, and then fly off.    
   > Most of these crew were described as pretty much 100% human.    
   >    
   > Quite a few reports, even those published in newspapers, came from young    
   > children. Interestingly, children reported "aliens" that are significantly    
   > shorter than the ~6 ft average in the table above. IOW. kids see aliens that    
   > are about the same height as themselves.    
   >    
   > Aliens. Or maybe something else is going on. :)   
   If you're going to volunteer like some sort of troll to debunk what I wrote,   
   why don't you debunk the material I posted from YT, i. e., Dr. Mack declaring   
   that these abductions are recounted in credible details, which appear to match   
   somewhat from    
   abductee to abductee, by normal, intelligent people?  Debunk that, if you   
   can.  And if Dr. Mack is not a believer, he damn sure is not a disbeliever in   
   these "experiencers."  Otherwise he would not have written the book   
   _Abduction._   
      
   Apparently the aliens are making babies with the abductees.   I don't know if   
   I believe any of this or not, but I damn sure am curious and would like to   
   know something about the "hybrids."  Hell, it's time Joe Rogan interviewed one   
   or more of these    
   hybrids, if indeed they exist.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)