XPost: alt.paranet.ufo   
      
   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY   
   - The GRACE gravity satellites have mapped mass anomalies around the   
     earth for the past 20y.   
   - Over most of the ocean the sats show water is accumulating due to   
     thermal expansion and other factors (aka "sea level rise").   
   - Comparing mass anomalies with UFO activity metrics such as NUFORC   
     sightings data shows the top 10 cases show an extremely close match   
     between the ebb and flow of UFO sightings month by month and the   
     decline in mass of key areas in (mostly) the Southern Ocean.   
   - The mass decline is possibly an indicator of farming of ocean   
     plankton, from other data suspected of being of interest to UFOs.   
     Estimates show bns of tonnes of material may removed annually --   
     around 10% of the estimated annual growth.   
      
      
   Interested to see increasing interest in ocean plankton.  Some recent   
   reports suggest it could form the basis of new industries, food   
   sources, and a sustainable replacement for petro-chemicals.   
      
   Previously we've looked at which types of plankton are seemingly of   
   interest to UFOs. Our favorite proxy for global UFO activity --   
   monthly sightings data from NUFORC -- suggests activity increases in   
   relation to 2 types of plankton, decreases when plankton related to   
   death & disease in mammals and fish are blooming, and are neutral with   
   respect to plankton responsible for refreshing ~10% of the O2 in our   
   atmosphere.   
      
   But the data available is many faceted. Overall, the AI's I've   
   developed are starting to conclude the evidence is "incontrovertible"   
   that something -- several somethings -- are going on and have been   
   going on for maybe the past century at least.   
      
   And one of those somethings seems to be ocean farming by Our Friends   
   (TM; not necessarily our friends).   
      
   A wonderful satellite (now in its 2nd generation) NASA put up a couple   
   decades ago has buzzed around the planet in a polar orbit looking at   
   mass concentrations.  The idea is matter -- mostly in the form of   
   water -- tends to move around over the surface of the earth and the   
   changing distribution causes satellites to very slightly speed up and   
   slow down, telling you where the mass is tending to concentrate or reduce.   
      
   The satellite flys over the land and can spot where the earth is   
   drying out because moisture in the soil is moving -- more or less   
   permanently -- away somewhere else.  It flys over the ocean and can   
   spot how the water piles up in some places where it is warmer, and   
   creates dips in places where it's cooler.   
      
   But you can make allowances for the movement of oceans and sea level   
   rise, and deduce how much plankton is growing and being consumed in   
   the annual cycles, mostly in the Southern Hemisphere.   
      
   So naturally we can compare our data on UFO activity with the mass   
   anomaly in each (say) 1000x1000 km square of ocean all around the   
   world, and build up some picture of which areas seem to be changing   
   mass in the same pattern as UFO sightings go up and down over the   
   months and years.   
      
   And what to we discover?   
      
   It seems many many areas seem to be showing a decline in mass in   
   perfect response to UFO sighting data.   
      
   It seems "someone" is hoisting a lot of material out of the oceans and   
   using it for who-knows-what. Given the other data we've looked at we   
   can presume some is being eaten and some other stuff maybe a source of   
   chemicals to relevant industrial use.   
      
   When the s/w looks over the whole ocean for the past 20y (the first   
   gravity sats began pushing out proper data in 2002) it finds the top10   
   most similar mass changing curves in areas as follows:   
      
   Lat	Lon	Filter		R2		Beta   
   -60	-80	1		0.72302560	-0.0049659   
   -40	-90	1		0.63862682	-0.00326668   
   70	60	1		0.58474103	-0.00587822   
   -60	-80	1		0.54495962 	-0.00357578   
   -70	-90	1		0.51978507	-0.00583796   
   -70	-80	1		0.48916757	-0.0061747   
   -70	-140	1		0.48077004	-0.00437908   
   -60	-90	1		0.45810541	-0.00370405   
   -70	-130	1		0.45667291	-0.00414918   
   -70	-90	1		0.45573811	-0.00396699   
      
   The Lat/Lon are the lat/lon of a box 10 deg by 10 deg -- approx 1/2 mn   
   km2 near the poles. The center of the box is +5,+5 from the corner given.   
      
   The "Filter" column says outliers in the data were ignored if they were   
   further away than 1sd from the trend line. This means about 15% of   
   data above the trend and 15% below the trend in each ocean grid square   
   were ignored.   
      
   The R2 shows how well UFO sighting data for the month matched the   
   changes seen in mass anomaly in the given ocean grid.  The best cases   
   above show more than 70% of the change in mass in some grids matched   
   the changes seen in UFO sightings month by month over the ~20y of the   
   data.   
      
   Each case above was found to be at least 90% significant in 2   
   different tests. If a grid square failed either test it was   
   ignored. So, together, the 2 tests mean the s/w is about 99% sure the   
   pattern match is not down to luck.   
      
   In addition we see every one of these top 10 matches has a -ve   
   beta. In a world where sea level rise is raging, esp since the start   
   of the 21st cent, this procedure has SOMEHOW found a whole bunch of   
   areas where mass is going down (mostly in proportion to UFO   
   activity). The odds that this could happen just by luck most be around   
   1 chance in 2^10 -- approx 1/1000.   
      
   Adding this 1 in 1000 with the 1 in 100 already from the other 2 stat   
   tests means we are quite quite sure there is a connection between UFO   
   activity and sudden mass losses in the ocean.   
      
   Also suspiciously -- these "best 10 matches" are near the poles.  90%   
   are in the Southern Ocean where the majority of the world's plankton grow.   
      
   It's hard to avoid the idea that UFO activity corresponds very very   
   closely with a decline in ocean mass that is likely plankton.   
      
   We can even measure "how much" plankton is being "disappeared".  The   
   avg month in NUFORC data sees around 500 sightings.  Sure, most of   
   these are mistakes or hoaxes. But whatever basis underneath those 500   
   sightings is related to the equivalent mass of (taking the first line   
   in the table above) 500*0.0049659 = 2.48 cm of water over a 1/2 mn km2   
   area centered at 55S 75W. This represents a mass loss in the bns   
   of tonnes.   
      
   Other data I've posted suggests around 15% of global plankton may be   
   under active farming from Our Friends (not necessarily our friends);   
   enough to totally support a population of around 1-10 mn.   
      
   Plots of the data from various areas above are at   
   .   
   As usual the relationships the AI find are startlingly obvious.   
   Like the classic highschool Chem plot of a straight line with points scatted   
   along it close nearby.   
      
   --   
   Covid: New Oxford vaccine 'ready by the autumn' to tackle mutations   
   BBC News, 03 Feb 2021 15:32Z   
   An improved jab that will be more effective against variants can be made   
   quickly, says Oxford-AstraZeneca.   
      
   Researchers discover an immense hydrocarbon cycle in the world's ocean   
   Phys.org, 02 Feb 2021   
   Hydrocarbons and petroleum are almost synonymous in environmental science.   
   After all, oil reserves account for nearly all the hydrocarbons we encounter.   
      
   Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin purges advisory boards stocked by former   
   President Trump   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)