From: jimmyw836@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, May 29, 2021 at 1:19:55 PM UTC-4, R Kym Horsell wrote:   
   > Skywatcher  wrote:   
   > > Those are dynamite discoveries. I have been watching them on TUBI, and I   
   demand that you do too.   
   > > Scientific analysis so far, including DNA, says they are for real, not   
   fake. Each finger has 6 phalanges, and each of three toes per foot has 5   
   phalanges.   
   > > They are not human and Mayan antiquities show textiles and other human   
   crafts of creatures with three fingers.   
   > > Go for it! This in my opinion is one of the greatest discoveries of my   
   lifetime. And I am 76 years old.   
   > I think we all know that the hard data suggests there is a non-human   
   > intelligence around here somewhere. :)   
   >   
   > But the data suggests "UFO people" are not likely just the one thing.   
   > Maybe not even a mix of 2 things.   
   >   
   > Never go by just one study ("single study syndrome"). It may illustrate   
   > an interesting possibility. But until there are many confirming   
   > and independent studies that come to the same conclusion then Science will   
   > not likely accept it.   
   >   
   > Never go by any number of Youtube's. They are the least reliable of any   
   > evidence. The whole point of using a vid is to confuse the gullible.   
   > They are likely con jobs. Even people trying to show things that are agreed   
   > facts tend to resort to fakery on camera to "prove" it.   
   >   
   > In science you have to be careful to rule out alternatives.   
   >   
   > Most things can be interpreted in many ways.   
   > 6-fingeredness/toeness ("hexadactyly") is a reasonably common human   
   > condition as are tying boards around babies heads to make them grow   
   egg-shaped. :{   
      
   I had lots of collegiate zoology classes and know all about that, but there is   
   no historical literature of humans or humanoids with three fingers per hand or   
   three toes per foot.   
   There are plenty of artifacts from the Nazca area, however, which show   
   3-fingered creatures.   
      
   > DNA breaks down into pieces pretty fast and anything 100s of years old   
   > could "look like" bits of anything because most of human DNA is "junk"   
   > and can just by chance contain things that look like short sequences   
   > from other species or from no known species.   
   >   
   > And (maybe) finally -- reports that some UFO people are trying to   
   "interbreed"   
   > with humans suggests those UFO people are humans. Oh, sure, they have   
   > advanced tech in some areas. But if they are another species   
   > let alone if they are from a different creation their DNA (or whatever   
   > they use) is very very very unlikely to be combine easily via   
   > "natural" methods. In a lab you can transfer genese from any species   
   > to any other. You can't screw a dig and get a dog-man.   
   >   
   > And, sure, anyone on USENET these days is over 70 if not over 80.   
      
   Now don't be a bitch, Kym.   
      
   These mummies are shown on TUBI.  Watch them.  A Peruvian doctor and a   
   Peruvian biologist both believe these mummies are genuine.  The mummies were   
   found near the Nazca lines which can only be seen from altitude.   
      
   https://tubitv.com/movies/588613/alien-mummies-of-peru?start=true   
      
   There is much more.  DNA has been taken and analyzed.  https://w   
   w.rt.com/news/421098-peru-alien-mummy-dna/   
      
   The mummies preserved in a diatomaceous earth powder are a dynamite   
   discovery.  My college courses in comparative anatomy tell me they are not   
   hoaxes.   
      
   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5490253/Three-fi   
   gered-alien-mummy-not-human-researcher-claims.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)