home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.ufo.reports      The latest from planet crackpot      8,965 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,321 of 8,965   
   Skywatcher to MrPosti...@kymhorsell.com   
   Re: a model of UFO navigation -- where a   
   10 Feb 22 09:43:48   
   
   From: jimmyw836@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 8:17:55 PM UTC-5, MrPosti...@kymhorsell.com   
   wrote:   
   > Summary of article posted to other group.    
   >    
   > EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:    
   > - In a similar way to modeling UFO interplanetary movements to    
   > "explain" the rise and fall of sightings over time, we can use the    
   > distance from putative bases on earth to predict the sighting    
   > density of objects across e.g. the USA.    
   > - Assuming the sighting density per state population is related to    
   > some power of the distance from given points on earth, we can locate    
   > a small number of points where these models are both statistically    
   > relevant at high confidence and also explain a large part of the    
   > state-to-state differences in sightings.    
   > - For Triangle UFO's (as an example) the pre 2006 and post 2006 data    
   > from the NUFORC database allows us to double check the relevant    
   > "best models". They are found to both include regions along the    
   > Antarctic coast as well as small areas along the Arctic coast. No    
   > other points on earth explain all the data.    
   > - We find the power law in the "best case" relating straight-line    
   > ("great circle") distance from the Antarctic to each US state is a    
   > power of around 4. I.e. the states *further* from the particular    
   > site in the Antarctic see more sightings per cap than those closer.    
   > - This not only implies the objects are not appearing randomly over    
   > the US like a bunch of tourists, but there appears to be a    
   > considerable amount of loitering over the relevant destination    
   > areas.    
   > - The data is consistent with Triangles flying direct to certain    
   > areas they find interesting and loitering longer on average in    
   > regions further from their "home base" than those closer.    
   >    
   > (Other posted articles at ).   
      
   Dr. Steven Greer says that most of these triangles, if not all of them, are   
   home-grown and exhibit properties like rivets, undercarriages, and other   
   characteristics which give them away as ours.  They do fly like real UFOs,   
   however, and out-maneuver    
   conventional fighter jets.  You can get Greer on YouTube and tubi.  His latest   
   covered a good two hours of interesting claims by Dr. Greer and others.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca