Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.ufo.reports    |    The latest from planet crackpot    |    8,965 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,493 of 8,965    |
|    phister to Kym Horsell    |
|    Re: Draft: PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS ON UNIDE    |
|    18 Apr 23 07:00:29    |
      From: phister@inbox.com              On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:47:56 -0700 (PDT), Kym Horsell wrote:              > On Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 4:10:21 AM UTC+10, phister wrote:       > ...       >> I am very old and have been interested in unexplained phenonema for ~70       >> odd years, but not seen either a UFO or a ghost. I have a picture of a       >> strange structure on the dark side of the moon, courtesy of Google       >> Earth.       > ...       >       > Jacques Vallee is very old -- if you think 80+ is old. :) He relates a       > story of working at an observatory in his youth where he was       > "disappointed" when a telescope captured pix of things flying across the       > sky and his boss threw them away because they were rubbish. "We see       > these all the time" he was told. "We ignore them".       >       > Pictures can be interesting but are nothing compared with lived       > experience. They can also be a let-down. :)       >       > Two of the recent ones doing the rounds on special interest groups       > illustrate the pitfalls. Both were from Mars robots. One showed some       > strange shape in the sky near the horizon. The other was a picture of       > what looked like a doorway cut into the side of a hill.       >       > Analysis showed the "thing in the sky" was most likely a spec on the       > camera lens because in several images it was in exactly the same       > position to the pixel. It was also not visible from other angles       > covering the same part of the landscape at the same time.       >       > The doorway was interesting but hard to say whether it was natural or       > not. Some people insisted it was an optical illusion -- like one of       > those "installations" created by an artist hanging a bunch of stuff from       > strings and forming an image if viewed from one angle. It sure looks       > like the kind of thing an earthmoving machine on Earth would make. But       > on Mars could it happen naturally over millions of years?       >       > I've seen many blobs on the moon from various photos. Always a problem       > to figure them out. Some are -- unknown to the viewer -- patched       > together from images taken at different times and the shadows have moved       > and made it look like something is there when it isn't. The shadows       > anyway can make it look like a dome is there when it is actually a       > crater. If only they had video of the spot and we could see how it       > changed over time or run it through a s/w that can extract 3d from       > images.       >       > Nothing really is as good as your own eyes and brain. I've taken pix of       > things and been totally disappointed what I caught looked "nothing like"       > what I think I saw at the time. Your eyes and brain see one thing from       > whatever is dancing around in front of you over seconds or minutes, but       > the camera sees a blob over a fraction of a scond that could be       > anything. :)       >       > If you look up at night it's possible you have seen something unusual       > but just not realized it.       >       > It's gotten to the stage where I go out on a clear eveneing if I do NOT       > see something fly across the sky that is not mundane then I get       > disappointed. :)       >       > Some UFO researchers disregard "lights in the sky" (LITS) because they       > "could be anything". But, to me, these are the most interesting because       > they seem to happen "all the time" but most people just ignore them.       >       > They have their little tricks tho. A light can appear suddenly anywhere       > in the sky and hang motionless. Then disappear. All within a matter of a       > few seconds. If you are not looking exactly at that part of the sky at       > the right time you see nothing. Or maybe you see something out of the       > corner of your eye come and go but by the time you turn in that       > direction it is gone and you shake your head, say you're seeing things,       > and go back inside.       >       > Another little trick I have noticed is you turn around from looking one       > place and you look at a couple of stars some other place. Nothing seems       > unusual. Until you realize you dont remember seeing a pair of relatively       > bright stars in that part of the sky earlier in the evenening. Keep       > watching. Sometimes one of them moves off after sitting there a few sec.       > More than one time I keep watching and the 2nd one moves off as well in       > the other direction.       >       > Otherwise it's pretty much up to you to figure out what a satellite       > looks like and whether this thing is behaving 100% like that. Satellites       > dont come from the east, for example. The NE or the SE either. And sats       > curve toward the equator not away from it. They cant change direction in       > the middle of the sky. And they cant move faster than about 5 sec across       > your finger, and they can't hang stationary or near-stationary 45 deg N       > or S of the equator. When they move N/S or S/N (usu slightly to the W of       > N/S if they are polar sats) they have a minimum speed; if they are       > slower then they just can't be in orbit.       >       > But the best LITS events are where aircraft chase after them or in some       > way "tangle" with them. It seems some countries have a policy of chasing       > them off, esp near airports.       >       > Sometimes at night I've seen military choppers "shake the clouds" and       > little lights come out and run away. It's even gotten to the stage where       > this has happened during the day. Just a couple weeks back I was sitting       > out with a coffee and I looked up and saw a small aircraft circling       > around the area at a good height. Eventualy I noticde there were little       > white dots up there moving in and out and around the few fluffy clouds.       > And the plane seemed to be trying to harass them into leaving.       >       > Once you have the knack of seeing these kinds of things you ten to see       > them ",all the time".       > I'm fretting at the moment becase the last couple times the sky was       > clear enough to see lots of stars none of them had been moving or       > shining purple lasers in my eyes!              I dont know what altitude sonic bangs cease to occur, but many people       guess the elevation of various UFO sightings to a few thousand feet. They       then describe these objects as moving off silently at extremely high       speed. Maybe there is a mechanism where a vacuum corridor can be produced       in the atmosphere ahead of any object movement, but surely that would also       make some noise.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca