From: kymhorsell@gmail.com   
      
   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY   
   - We look at the effect of the HAARP project on clouds and the weather.   
   - It's suspected the US military has conducted experiments on   
     controlling aspects of the weather in N Alaska. And we find there   
     are some footprints that match the operation dates of HAARP and   
     a deduced "performance profile" as the project proceeded from   
     start-up to "full effectiveness" during the experiment.   
   - We note a similar project is believed to be in operation in   
     Antarctica.  It is at least possible that such an operation might   
     effect clouds seen over SE Aus given weather at certain times of   
     year blows in from the Southern Ocean around W Antarctica.   
   - Pentagon documents indicate the USAF has a specific intention to   
     control aspects of the weather to "dis-incline" competitor pilots to fly.   
   - HAARP seems to have had a slight but stat sig dampening effect on UFO   
     sightings over Alaska in the course of its operation.   
      
      
   Things rattle around in my head. Sometimes for quite a while.  But   
   eventually it seems everything rattling around in there comes in   
   useful for something.   
      
   A few years back someone sent me a PDF entitled "Owning the Weather   
   in 2025". It was something written by an USAF group looking at the   
   advantages of having a handle on certain types of weather. The   
   preamble of the paper highlighted being able to "dis-incline"   
   pilots from some opposing AF from taking to the sky at critical   
   times. The paper was presented to the Pentagon in 1996.   
      
   Flash forward to 2023. Over the past couple years I've become used to   
   sitting out at night at least for an hour and watching various unusual   
   things going on in my part of the world.  I don't know what it is, but   
   maybe living on a major airline route into an international airport   
   has some advantages for entertainment purposes.   
      
   Oftentimes a few lights will go over early in the evening. Some of   
   them are probably satellites. But some definitely can not be   
   satellites unless you suspend basic orbital mechanics. I've also   
   become used to certain events being validated by local -- what I   
   assume are -- low-key light aircraft that trail and sometimes harass   
   said lights.  One sequence of events I managed to capture on my   
   primitive passive radar suggested some lights -- whatever the ones   
   that don't seem to be sats and seem to move in ways drones and balloons   
   should not be able to match -- see the approach of some of these small   
   aircraft as something to be avoided. Amusingly, some larger lights   
   just keep right on coming and don't seem to worry about the odd   
   super-close encounter.  I recall one interaction occurred maybe 500m   
   overhead with a big fuzzy bright yellow orb coming in from the N and a   
   twin-engine plane coming in from the S.  Flipping my view back and   
   forth as the 2 approached missed the probably amusing but no doubt   
   very expert 180 degree turn the plane apparently did when the 2 were   
   maybe 200m apart and seemingly headed for a hard landing.   
      
   But things have not so subtly changed in the past couple months.  The   
   peak "viewing times" I'm used to are now usually 100% overcast.  The   
   day can be sunny sunny sunny, but as the interesting time of day   
   approaches clouds seem to roll in at high speed from usually multiple   
   directions and the whole sky is uniform gray. The times where this has   
   NOT happened probably numbers less than a dozen.   
      
   The reason this has me wondering is -- not just the time of day but   
   the days of week seem to predict clouds rolling in. E.g. they seem to   
   have a familiar weekly timetable.   
      
   A nice Japanese sat monitors clouds over this part of the Pacific and   
   Southern Ocean. Running those images through some of the learning   
   programs finds the day of week seems to predict a good deal about how   
   thick the clouds will be at "peak viewing times" each day.  It's --   
   stop me if this sounds too crazy :) -- someone or something is trying   
   to interfere with someone watching the ground from the sky or maybe   
   someone on the ground from watching something in the sky.   
      
   So you see where that rattling reference to controlling the weather   
   might come in.   
      
   Roughly I'm thinking -- it could be "them" or is could be "us".  But   
   could it *be* us? We have that USAF paper. But is there any evidence   
   that "us" can modify the weather at all?   
      
   So I asked a little program to go off and see if there was any such   
   evidence. It spent a happy day downloading stuff from various places,   
   running huge sifting jobs on several cpus in the serious corner of the   
   lounge, and finally a couple hrs back pushed some evidence in my face   
   that I ran some checks on.   
      
   And, yes, there seems to be *some* evidence "us" can modify the   
   weather.  And quite a bit more.   
      
   The s/w came up with the infamous HAARP project. Supposedly this was   
   a simple project run in the 90s and early 00s to measure things going   
   on in the ionosphere. All very interesting science, I'm sure.  But   
   from photos of the equipment it seems along with a big array of   
   largish antennas there are some shipping containers that likely   
   contained some big generators and/or transmitters. Various things on the   
   net suggest they were involved in bouncing high power radio signals   
   off the ionosphere. And, of course, there are the web sites saying it   
   was a weather control experiment of some kind.   
      
   Most interesting for me, it also turns out there is another HAARP   
   project, this time somewhere in Antarctica. So whatever might have   
   been going on in the Arctic of N Alaska might also be going on   
   wherever that is. Judging by the direction of clouds in the Japanese   
   sat images -- somewhere off to the SW of me aka the Antarctic Peninsula   
   or there-abouts.   
      
   The initial things that got the AI program interested was cosmic rays   
   and clouds. We've seen before that clouds and ufos have some kind of   
   relationship. It seems various properties of clouds in a region can   
   predict how many ufos are reported. There is the obvious reason --   
   people can't see very well through thick clouds.  But there are some   
   subtleties to the patterns. It seems UFO's on avg travel at a   
   characteristic height. If the cloud tops are below that height they   
   can't be seen as readily. But if the clouds travel higher they can be   
   spotted. However, if the clouds are way too high it seems they   
   re-adjust their habits and fly even higher and become less numerous --   
   apparently -- again.   
      
   From personal observation it seems those little lights seem to like   
   travelling close to if not INSIDE clouds. On one occasion a big   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)