Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.ufo.reports    |    The latest from planet crackpot    |    8,965 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,551 of 8,965    |
|    Kym Horsell to All    |
|    ufo weather: recent cloud changes linked    |
|    21 Oct 23 15:55:52    |
      From: kymhorsell@gmail.com              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:       - We recall that UFO sightings have a strong stat pattern linking them to        day of the week. The pattern is also seen in MADAR sightings so is        not simply an effect of observer behaviour. We have prev noted that        UFO spatial distributions suggest some obj avoid AFB and area patrols.        Light aircraft seem to do the patrols and "escorting"/"harassing" in        Australia rather than military craft as in some other countries.        Whether noisy civil aircraft trying to chase off LITS is more or        less obvious than a couple of fighter jets is arguable.       - In my local region clouds over the past several months have changed        their daily pattern to seemingly mimic UFO sightings. Max clouds        seem to now roll in at times of expected highest UFO activity. The       behaviour of local "patrol aircraft" has changed        as well. In the past patrols seemed to peak when the maximum        number of unusual objects in the night sky were visible. Over the        past few months patrols have relaxed and the clouds have taken over        the "move along; nothing to see here" function.       - Various stat tests show these relationships are significant        according to 2 indep stats tests.       - Using these factoids a movie has been made showing recent regional        cloud activity and the expected UFO activity vs historical activity        from similar days in the past 10 years according to NUFORC data.                     As I've been promising people visiting my BB for several years now --       I have some preliminary computer models that predict UFO activity       days, weeks or months in the future based on this and that. And one       of the thats is clouds.              And as mentioned in posts to these groups I've started to suspect that       "someone" may be manipulating at least some aspects of weather in my part of       the world to "modulate" the ability of either       ground observers to see objects in the sky at night and/or vice versa.              The work presented here is based on another piece of evidence for the       above in the form of IR images from weather satellites. By cutting out       part of the relevant images that has to do with just weather within a       couple 100s km from my location it turns out observed cloud activity       has a stat sig weekly timetable. It may be "normal" in some parts of       the world of industry/ag to see clouds come and go based on       human activity. Maybe even come and go based on the work week. Mental       model: smoke stacks might operate on a weekly cycle and smoke and haze       can change local weather conditions. But in my region clouds come in       off the Southern Ocean mostly direct from Antarctica. It's hard to       fathom how cloud parameters can vary because of human activity in the       Antarctic or Southern Ocean. There is no industry out there to do the       modifying.              But nevertheless it is happening. If you boil the relevant sequence of       weather sat images down to a number based on cloud temperature seen in       the image, we find those numbers are strongly related to the day of       the week. And also showing a stat sig similarity with       the weekly cycle of UFO sightings. But the more interesting thing       seems to be -- this relationship has only started up in my region       AFAIK recently. By recently I mean the past few months.              The output from the relevant time-series regression using dow to       predict cloud temperatures seen in my region hr by hr since the start       of Oct (just a conveniently small dataset to present here) looks like:              Sampled`dataset:       Date``````````````````````````DOW````CloudTemp`````predictedCloudTemp       ```20231001`````````````````````1``````190.248``````183.344       ```20231002`````````````````````2``````147.959``````187.167**(2sd`diff)       ```20231002`````````````````````2``````172.738``````187.167       ```20231003`````````````````````3``````186.973```````190.99       ```20231003`````````````````````3``````195.163```````190.99       ```20231004`````````````````````4``````188.339``````194.813       ```20231008`````````````````````1``````209.815``````183.344*(1sd`diff)       ```20231009`````````````````````2``````218.096``````187.167*       ```20231012`````````````````````5``````210.565``````198.637       ```20231013`````````````````````6``````196.944```````202.46       ```20231013`````````````````````6``````211.069```````202.46       ```20231017`````````````````````3``````215.535```````190.99*       ```20231019`````````````````````5``````203.472``````198.637       ```20231020`````````````````````6``````187.603```````202.46       ```20231021`````````````````````7``````184.094``````206.283*              MODEL:       y = 3.82318*x + 179.521       beta in 3.82318 +- 0.805445 (90% CI)       alpha in 179.521 +- 3.80707        T-test: P(beta>0) = 1.000000       Rank test: calculated Spearman corr = 0.349989        critical value = 0.306 2-sided at 5%; reject H0:not_connected       r2 = 0.14205733                     The dataset shows that for hourly images from the weather sats that we       extract a "CloudTemp" for the local region we can use the day-of-week       (Sun==1) to predict the CloudTemp code. The model formula is only a       rough estimate but the 2 stats tests show it is strongly linked with       the actual extracted cloud temp. We can covert the CloudTemp to an       actual temperature in deg C but that's not terribly relevant here. All       we need to note is that for some reason the temp of clouds rolling in       off the Southern Ocean seem to be influenced by the day of the week       somehow.              We have seen previously that UFO sightings seem to have a strong       statistical pattern linked to day of week. It is certainly true that       UFO observers may be influenced by the day of the work week. But we       have also seen previously there is a "real" pattern in there because       the UFO activity observed by robot stations (MADAR) has exactly the       same pattern.              From the NUFORC summary data we can extract a count by day of week for       just Octobers between 2010-2022 as:              2 782       3 898       4 936       5 1004       6 1062       7 1377       1 968              As we've seen before a couple times sightings seem to increase from       Monday making Sat the busiest day of LITS and metallic spheres       and whatever, then sharply declining for Sun and back to Monday at       minimum again.              If we do the same thing for the CloudTemp numbers seen hourly for Oct       2023 so far we get:              DOW`````av`CloudTemp````sd`CloudTemp       2```````179.567`````````41.6782       3```````177.489`````````40.2682       4```````169.576`````````49.7941       5```````186.492`````````38.7821       6```````194.404`````````32.554       7```````200.963`````````23.5072       1```````186.212`````````35.1885                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca