home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.ufo.reports      The latest from planet crackpot      8,965 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,640 of 8,965   
   Dawn Flood to Attila   
   Re: NASA's great conspiracy   
   30 Jun 25 16:24:23   
   
   XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 6/30/2025 4:48 AM, Attila wrote:   
   > On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 14:39:52 -0500, Dawn Flood   
   >  in alt.atheism with message-id   
   > <103s4q3$1mgaf$1@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 6/29/2025 2:25 PM, Attila wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 09:06:47 -0500, Dawn Flood   
   >>>  in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>> <103rh9j$1i4so$2@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 6/27/2025 2:11 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>>>> On 6/27/25 12:21 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Big Red Flag whenever anyone accuses a collective group of strangers   
   >>>>>> "of lying".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Bigger red flag when a rotating sock puppet attacks   
   >>>>> a straw man in defense of their acting out like an   
   >>>>> autistic child.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It is pure insanity to suggest that NASA (or, for that matter, any other   
   >>>> government organization) is "conspiring" on anything whatsoever!  Just   
   >>>> look at the various national security agencies; even deeply classified   
   >>>> information has a tendency to leak, eventually.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Ergo, there is NO "alien coverup," because, there are NO aliens!  Or,   
   >>>> for that matter, concrete evidence of life anywhere beyond our World.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Dawn   
   >>>   
   >>> There is no definitive evidence either way.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Burden of proof?  What is the "definitive evidence" against the   
   >> existence of fairies?   
   >   
   > That is trying to prove a negative.   
   >   
      
   And, what's wrong with that??  When is "absence of evidence evidence of   
   absence??"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca