home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.ufo.reports      The latest from planet crackpot      8,965 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,644 of 8,965   
   jojo to Attila   
   Re: NASA's great conspiracy   
   30 Jun 25 22:20:46   
   
   XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   Attila wrote:   
   > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:33:25 +0000, jojo  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id   
   > <4f8468ce-d2cc-0fae-250c-abd2fe3a6ee1@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Attila wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 22:13:10 -0400, JTEM    
   >>> in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>> <103srrm$1qivm$3@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 6/29/25 4:50 PM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> what are your thoughts on the government having ufos?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Well. I'd say that, based on my statements that I do not   
   >>>> believe the UFO narrative, that I do not believe it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There has been lots & lots of alien tech sent to (towards)   
   >>>> the earth. It's simply a matter of numbers.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Again, if only once in every million years an alien race   
   >>>> notices that the earth is a life bearing world and sends   
   >>>> a probe, there's been thousands sent to us since The   
   >>>> Great Oxidation Event.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There's been more than 60 since the KT Boundary where the   
   >>>> dinosaurs were wiped out.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There's been 2 to 3 since the genus Homo officially arose   
   >>>> with Homo habilis...   
   >>>   
   >>> Why would anyone bother with an ordinary out of the way star   
   >>> like our sun?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> our sun is in a very sweet spot, not too close to the center   
   >> where life can be fried by other exploding stars and not too much   
   >> at the edge exposed to cosmic radiation.   
   >   
   > That describes life as we know it.  Perhaps there is other   
   > life that requires much more radiation, light, whatever or   
   > less that we do.  Perhaps a silicon rather than a carbon   
   > based life form.  Or something entirely different.   
   >   
   > We just don't know.   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >> similar to the goldilocks zone for planetary habitation, there's   
   >> likely one for the galaxy as well.   
   >   
   > There are known planets in the so-called "Goldilocks zone"   
   > in other stellar systems.   
   >   
      
   yes kepler found many in that zone, some of them seem to be water   
   worlds, which is really good.   
      
   because it oberserved only 0.2% of the sky and stars mostly few   
   hundred light years away.   
      
   yes it is possible for non-carbon based life, but considering the   
   chemical abundance distribution, my bet is on carbon.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca