XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   % wrote:   
   > jojo wrote:   
   >> % wrote:   
   >>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>> On 6/29/2025 9:08 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>>>> On 6/29/25 3:39 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Burden of proof?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Odd how that vanishes when we speak of, oh, I dunno, maybe   
   >>>>> "Abiogeneis"...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Every last abiogenesis hypothesis ever tested has been   
   >>>>> falsified, yet fake atheists maintain the faith and   
   >>>>> pretend they're not...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Every abiogenesis hypothesis??  And, so, let me guess, "God   
   >>>> did it" is the only remaining explanation.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> What is the "definitive evidence" against the existence of   
   >>>>>> fairies?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What is the "Definitive Evidence" to support the existence   
   >>>>> of atheists?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You need to be reminded, GAWD knows it won't help but, the   
   >>>>> online "atheists" insists that self reports aren't any kind   
   >>>>> of evidence at all.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So either accept "Self Reports" i.e. the testimony of   
   >>>>> theists or, admit that there's no evidence what so ever for   
   >>>>> the existence of atheists.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Do you still believe in them? The atheists?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Here it is (how many times have I posted this link???):   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic_atheism   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The Wikipedia article is astonishing (virtually all of them   
   >>>> are, and EMPHASIS mine):   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Agnostic atheism — or atheistic agnosticism — is a   
   >>>> PHILOSOPHICAL POSITION that encompasses both atheism and   
   >>>> agnosticism...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Bravo, Wikipedia!!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Dawn   
   >>>>   
   >>> wikipedia can be changed by its readers ,   
   >>> you may be reading what someone just like me added   
   >>   
   >> have you edited any articles? i have read they have a very   
   >> non-open and fascist type editing system.   
   >>   
   > they have to have or anyone could say anything and it would just   
   > get stupid   
      
   yeah but then how can a normal guy like me put in his voice? not   
   that i want to, sounds boring af dealing with people politics.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)