XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   % wrote:   
   > jojo wrote:   
   >> % wrote:   
   >>> jojo wrote:   
   >>>> % wrote:   
   >>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 6/29/2025 9:08 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 6/29/25 3:39 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Burden of proof?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Odd how that vanishes when we speak of, oh, I dunno, maybe   
   >>>>>>> "Abiogeneis"...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Every last abiogenesis hypothesis ever tested has been   
   >>>>>>> falsified, yet fake atheists maintain the faith and   
   >>>>>>> pretend they're not...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Every abiogenesis hypothesis??  And, so, let me guess, "God   
   >>>>>> did it" is the only remaining explanation.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> What is the "definitive evidence" against the existence   
   >>>>>>>> of fairies?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> What is the "Definitive Evidence" to support the existence   
   >>>>>>> of atheists?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You need to be reminded, GAWD knows it won't help but, the   
   >>>>>>> online "atheists" insists that self reports aren't any kind   
   >>>>>>> of evidence at all.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So either accept "Self Reports" i.e. the testimony of   
   >>>>>>> theists or, admit that there's no evidence what so ever for   
   >>>>>>> the existence of atheists.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Do you still believe in them? The atheists?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Here it is (how many times have I posted this link???):   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic_atheism   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The Wikipedia article is astonishing (virtually all of them   
   >>>>>> are, and EMPHASIS mine):   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Agnostic atheism — or atheistic agnosticism — is a   
   >>>>>> PHILOSOPHICAL POSITION that encompasses both atheism and   
   >>>>>> agnosticism...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Bravo, Wikipedia!!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> wikipedia can be changed by its readers ,   
   >>>>> you may be reading what someone just like me added   
   >>>>   
   >>>> have you edited any articles? i have read they have a very   
   >>>> non-open and fascist type editing system.   
   >>>>   
   >>> they have to have or anyone could say anything and it would   
   >>> just get stupid   
   >>   
   >> yeah but then how can a normal guy like me put in his voice?   
   >> not that i want to, sounds boring af dealing with people politics.   
   >>   
   > that's not the only thing wiki talks about   
      
   yeah the science, math and engineering parts are mostly golden. i   
   was not aware of issues with wiki until elon pointed it out.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)