XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christianity   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/1/2025 10:43 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:   
   > On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 22:30:03 -0400, JTEM  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 7/1/25 2:17 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> I think she was just saying you don't need evidence against something   
   >>> (that isn't known to exist) in order to reject it.   
   >>   
   >> It's a declaration. It's not an argument it's not even logical.   
   >>   
   >> Abiogenesis isn't known to exist. In fact, every last abiogenesis   
   >> hypothesis that has ever been tested was falsified. That would be   
   >> be powerful evidence AGAINST existing, not merely a lack of   
   >> evidence for. Yet the collective rudely defends abiogenesis as   
   >> fact.   
   >>   
   >> Stop confusing rationalizations for a valid opinion.   
   >   
   > So what's your alternative?   Did the Jolly Green Giant do it, you   
   > fake theist?   
      
   ROFL!   
      
   JTEM says that "abiogenesis has been falsified"; if so, what is the   
   citation for this?  (JTEM, please reference a scientific paper if you   
   reply.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)