XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christianity   
   From: andrew.321.remov@usa.net   
      
   "Attila" wrote in message news:42ea6kl14e750g85r9o0oo2p9ckn0pa1ak@4ax.com...   
    "Andrew" wrote:   
   >>"Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>> Andrew wrote:   
   >>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> name a single miracle; name a single scientific paper in the last 40   
   >>>>> years that appeals to "God" as being an explanation for anything.   
   >>>   
   >>>>                                                DNA   
   >>>   
   >>>> DNA is a molecule that contains the specific instructions for the   
   >>>> synthesis of ~~~ every living thing~~~ The prime origin of these   
   >>>> instructions that are in digital code format could of necessity -only-   
   >>>> be from a source of Intelligence.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Our most awesome Creator.....   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  GOD   
   >>>   
   >>> Okay, you didn't answer my question, and that is fine.   
   >>   
   >>There has been abundant scientific evidence in the   
   >>last 40 years, as well an since the very beginning of   
   >>time telling us that there has been a super Intelligence   
   >>involved in our existence.   
   >   
   > Such as what?  Direct evidence, not indirect evidence.   
      
   I just posted direct evidence above..   
      
   If you can't see it, that tells us you don't want to see it.   
      
   But then that would tell us that you were a fool.   
      
   >>"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that   
   >>  a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as   
   >>  with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind   
   >>  forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one   
   >>  calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as   
   >>  to put this conclusion almost beyond question."   
   >>                           ~ Fred Hoyle, astrophysicist   
   >   
   > Opinion without supporting fact.   
      
   Rather the conclusion of a scientist after examining the evidence.   
      
   "From my earliest training as a scientist I was very strongly   
   brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind   
   of deliberate creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed. I am   
   quite uncomfortable in this situation, the state of mind I now find   
   myself in. But there is no logical way out of it. I now find myself   
   driven to this position by logic. There is no other way in which we   
   can understand the precise ordering of the chemicals of life except to   
   invoke the creations on a cosmic scale. . . We were hoping as   
   scientists that there would be a way round our conclusion, but there   
   isn't."   
               ~ Sir Frederick Hoyle and Chandra Wickramsinghe,   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)