home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.ufo.reports      The latest from planet crackpot      8,965 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,776 of 8,965   
   Andrew W to Malte Runz   
   Re: NASA's great conspiracy (1/2)   
   07 Jul 25 10:23:50   
   
   XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: space@defense.com   
      
   "Malte Runz"  wrote in message   
   news:eoek6khnnmkai0cfrcftst4af8e0rvb0j7@4ax.com...   
   >   
   >On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 09:22:06 +1000, "Andrew W"    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>"Malte Runz"  wrote in message   
   >>news:mjnh6khvpsqq2871njjta0rta6fq0jsihb@4ax.com...   
   >>>   
   >>>On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 09:58:50 +1000, "Andrew W"    
   >>>wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>"Malte Runz"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:qbhf6klnb7a6djkojsklqo6iga95ssdfg4@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:24:07 +1000, "Andrew W"    
   >>>>>wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>(snip)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>Crashed craft retrieval cases have come out hundreds of times. ...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Now, that's what I call a 'positive claim', and we all know what that   
   >>>>>entails.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Only mainstream media followers and 'authority' followers have never   
   >>>>heard   
   >>>>of that. Normies.   
   >>>   
   >>>Of course I've heard the claims made before. Do you think you're the   
   >>>only kook on the internet?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>If you call me a kook then you also have to call air force pilots, senior   
   >>military officials and investigators etc. kooks too. ...   
   >   
   >And I do.   
   >   
      
   You have little or no knowledge or qualification to do so. It's you who has   
   no credibility.   
   Pilots and military officials are highly trained and have a career to look   
   after. They can't afford to talk crap.   
      
      
   >   
   >Did you see the hearings in the US Congress a while back?   
   >The airforce (?) guy who claimed that some of his superiors had   
   >ADMITTED!!!! that they were in the possession of alien crafts? He   
   >looked so god damned miserable in his chair, when it dawned on him   
   >that nobody believed him and that he most likely was the butt of a   
   >joke everyone else was in on. A proper kook, but honestly, I felt   
   >sorry for the guy.   
   >   
      
   That's just your woke emotion based reaction. You've been conditioned since   
   a young age to ridicule such things, and that's because of the CIA ridicule   
   program that's been running for decades, which you also don't know about.   
   Why do you never ask the obvious question: Why would governments go to so   
   much trouble to cover this up? I think you're not smart enough to think this   
   far.   
      
      
   >   
   >>It's far more likely that you're just an ignorant arrogant smartass troll   
   >>reacting from your emotions.   
   >   
   >Ignorant, no. But arrogant smartass, yes.   
   >   
      
   Thanks for the part admission.   
      
      
   >   
   >>>>>> ... Upgrade your   
   >>>>>>sources.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Name one.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Of course you don't know any except the mainstream info suppressing   
   >>>>ones.   
   >>>   
   >>>I can't possibly know what /your/ sources are.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>You don't have any proper sources so you're always on the lookout for   
   >>some.   
   >>That's obvious.   
   >   
   >Is this how you think it plays out in my mind?:   
   >   
   >'Wow! They have captured live aliens!!! How can I learn about that?   
   >   
      
   You don't want to learn about that, you just want to follow mainstream   
   authorities.   
      
      
   >   
   >Right, I better ask Andrew. He knows soooo much about these topics.   
   >   
      
   You wouldn't know who knows things/truths. You're obviously unable to   
   determine that. You just picked the easy, convenient and satisfying side and   
   stuck with it.   
      
      
   >   
   >Hey Andrew, can you refer me to a few of your superior sources,   
   >(because [snicker] I'm too lazy to look for it myself)?'   
   >   
   >You know exactly why I ask you for the evidence that has convinced   
   >you. (No, not the one single piece of evidence, and no, not all the   
   >evidence you have seen over the decades.)   
   >   
      
   Yes I know why you ask for my evidence and do zero proper research of your   
   own (like normal people). You just want to ridicule whatever you've been   
   conditioned to ridicule, because you're a man child.   
   Did your father lead to you to be like this? Was he a ridiculer and   
   mainstream/gov authority and media follower?   
      
      
   >   
   >>>Von Däniken? Alex   
   >>>Jones? Random Dude on Rumor Mill?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>They're all far smarter than you. Why can't you find/see the real truth   
   >>instead of just troll?   
   >   
   >Listen, there is only one troll in this, and it is the guy who keeps   
   >posting outrageous and unsubstantiated claims that he is not willing   
   >to back up and debate in a meaningful way.   
   >   
      
   You really don't get it. There are actually curious people in this world who   
   want to hear other than gov/media perspectives and narratives.   
   IOW my posts are not for your type. But I do like a challenge, and sometimes   
   people's minds are actually opened.   
      
      
   >   
   >>>Why don't you want to tell me?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Because you're just a dumb jerk who only follows and believes mainstream   
   >>slop.   
   >   
   >I think we have to look for the answer to my question elsewhere.   
   >   
      
   Your enquiries are false and insincere and you know it.   
      
   >   
   >I   
   >think you know that none of your sources would stand up to scrutiny.   
   >   
      
   You still think a.a is a courtroom or something.   
      
      
   >   
   >'A guy said X, and I choose to believe him!' and you're too   
   >embarrassed to show us.   
   >   
      
   You made up your mind a long time ago and you know it. You're just a clown   
   and mainstream sycophant.   
      
      
   >   
   >>>>>And no, don't wiggle your way out the usual way, suggesting   
   >>>>>I'm too lazy to find one myself.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You are lazy, two minute Google result believer.   
   >>>   
   >>>Wiggle wiggle wiggle.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>You can't face the truth.   
   >   
   >Try me.   
   >   
      
   Just another troll attempt.   
      
      
   >   
   >>>>>Also, this is not about what my   
   >>>>>sources have to say, it's all about /your/ sources.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>But your sources are lying/suppressing crap. That's the real issue.   
   >>>   
   >>>You're the one making the claim, therefore you provide the evidence.   
   >>>This can't be a new concept to you.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>No I'm just passing on 'claims' by investigators and official witnesses.   
   >>You obviously live in a very small world.   
   >   
   >Appeal to authorities noted.   
   >   
      
   What level of authority are they?   
      
      
   >   
   >>>>>So, do you have an 'upgraded source' that provides evidence for the   
   >>>>>retrieval of a crashed craft created by an alien race?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I have plenty ...   
   >>>   
   >>>So you say, but are unable to provide any. I call your bluff... again.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>So you want me to waste more time on the likes of you? Why?   
   >   
   >Ask yourself why you're responding to my posts in the first place.   
   >   
      
   It's an interesting challenge, and an opportunity to put clowns/jerks in   
   their places, and inform them of the gov psyops and narrative programs that   
   have been in place for decades.   
      
      
   >   
   >>>> ... but you will never search for yourself and switch. ...   
   >>>   
   >>>I can find hundreds, if not thousands, of people saying the same shit   
   >>>you do,   
   >>>   
   >>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca