XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christianity   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/6/2025 10:02 PM, Andrew wrote:   
   > "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:104eos5$2em5p$2@dont-email.me...   
   >> JTEM wrote:   
   >>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Check & mate!   
   >>>   
   >>> First off I need to congratulate you on your courage in   
   >>> rubber stamping a fellow node of the collective. Not just   
   >>> anyone is brave enough to agree with those you've already   
   >>> agreed with since before they spoke.   
   >>>   
   >>> Secondly, as you are oh so "Check & mate," can you just   
   >>> go ahead and cite some examples of this abiogenesis you   
   >>> think you seeing being studied?   
   >>>   
   >>> Yeah, just go ahead and cite this abiogenesis here:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>  {Crickets chirping}   
   >>>   
   >>> Oops! We found an error.   
   >>>   
   >>> Well. ANOTHER error...   
   >>>   
   >>> And how is it you know how long it takes for abiogenesis to   
   >>> occur?   
   >>>   
   >>> No? You're just making shit up?   
   >>>   
   >>> Exactly.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> A whole astonishing Wikipedia article is devoted to this subject:   
   >>   
   >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis   
   >>   
   >> One undeniable fact is that there are credible, distinguished   
   >> scientists who are studying this subject.  And, here is a book from   
   >> the National Academies Press, the publishing arm of the United States   
   >> National Academy of Sciences on this subject:   
   >>   
   >> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/10753/genesis-the-   
   >> scientific-quest-for-lifes-origin   
   >>   
   >> And, so, serious science is being done.   
   >   
   > Serious science has already seriously studied this issue.   
   > So if YOU are at all -serious-, then you will seriously   
   > take heed to what SCIENCE has seriously concluded on this very issue.   
   >   
   > Hard science is settled by repeated testing, experiment   
   > and observation.Spontaneous generation used to be a mainstream   
   > scientific teaching for a long time until it   
   > was proven wrong by the hard science experiments of   
   > Louis Pasteur and Francesco Redi.   
   >   
   > We now know for SURE that biologic life comes only   
   > from previously existing biologic life. There is no more debate,  Except   
   > today there are fools who like to argue a   
   > gainst what science has already determined.   
   >   
   > Folks, if you want the truth, go with the science and   
   > avoid the fools..   
   >   
   > This is now a law of science.   
   >   
   >             ~~The "Law of Biogenesis"~~   
   >   
   > Life comes only from previously existing life, and that of its own kind.   
   > It is a law of science.   
      
   Then you should complain!  Write to your congressperson, the NIH, the   
   NAS, the NSF, and even, the Trump administration, and tell them to STOP   
   using YOUR tax dollars to FUND this research!!   
      
   And, please get back to us on this.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)