XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christianity   
   From: andrew.321.remov@usa.net   
      
   "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:104mcqq$c3or$2@dont-email.me...   
   > Andrew wrote:   
   >> "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>> JTEM wrote:   
   >>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Check & mate!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> First off I need to congratulate you on your courage in   
   >>>> rubber stamping a fellow node of the collective. Not just   
   >>>> anyone is brave enough to agree with those you've already   
   >>>> agreed with since before they spoke.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Secondly, as you are oh so "Check & mate," can you just   
   >>>> go ahead and cite some examples of this abiogenesis you   
   >>>> think you seeing being studied?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yeah, just go ahead and cite this abiogenesis here:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> {Crickets chirping}   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Oops! We found an error.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Well. ANOTHER error...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And how is it you know how long it takes for abiogenesis to   
   >>>> occur?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No? You're just making shit up?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Exactly.   
   >>>   
   >>> A whole astonishing Wikipedia article is devoted to this subject:   
   >>>   
   >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis   
   >>>   
   >>> One undeniable fact is that there are credible, distinguished   
   >>> scientists who are studying this subject. And, here is a book from   
   >>> the National Academies Press, the publishing arm of the United States   
   >>> National Academy of Sciences on this subject:   
   >>>   
   >>> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/10753/genesis-the-   
   >>> scientific-quest-for-lifes-origin   
   >>>   
   >>> And, so, serious science is being done.   
   >>   
   >> Serious science has already seriously studied this issue.   
   >> So if YOU are at all -serious-, then you will seriously   
   >> take heed to what SCIENCE has seriously concluded on this very issue.   
   >>   
   >> Hard science is settled by repeated testing, experiment   
   >> and observation.Spontaneous generation used to be a mainstream   
   >> scientific teaching for a long time until it   
   >> was proven wrong by the hard science experiments of   
   >> Louis Pasteur and Francesco Redi.   
   >>   
   >> We now know for SURE that biologic life comes only   
   >> from previously existing biologic life. There is no more debate, Except   
   >> today there are fools who like to argue a   
   >> gainst what science has already determined.   
   >>   
   >> Folks, if you want the truth, go with the science and   
   >> avoid the fools..   
   >>   
   >> This is now a law of science.   
   >>   
   >>  ~~The "Law of Biogenesis"~~   
   >>   
   >> Life comes only from previously existing life, and that of its own kind.   
   >> It is a law of science.   
   >   
   > Then you should complain!  Write to your congressperson, the NIH, the   
   > NAS, the NSF, and even, the Trump administration, and tell them to STOP   
   > using YOUR tax dollars to FUND this research!!   
      
   What this research has basically consisted of has been   
   a number of scenarios on how life could have started.   
   All of which were built upon a foundation of fantasy.   
      
   Nothing to do with real world *science*.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)