[continued from previous message]   
      
   >Your enquiries are false and insincere and you know it.   
      
   Of course I'm insincere when I ask you for answers. I couldn't give a   
   fuck about your crazy ideas. I don't ask because I want to learn about   
   the kookery you believe is the truth. I ask you for answers, because I   
   know you have none. And my track record is immaculate.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>I   
   >>think you know that none of your sources would stand up to scrutiny.   
   >>   
   >   
   >You still think a.a is a courtroom or something.   
      
   Or something. Think of it as a challenge. You like challenges, don't   
   you?   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>'A guy said X, and I choose to believe him!' and you're too   
   >>embarrassed to show us.   
   >>   
   >   
   >You made up your mind a long time ago and you know it. ...   
      
   I was 18 or 19. Reading Carlos Castaneda while taking a shit one fine   
   afternoon. He claimed to have eaten some mushrooms and turning into a   
   bird. And he expected his readers to believe him!   
      
   If it hadn't been a library book, guess what I would have use to clean   
   myself.   
      
   > ... You're just a clown   
   >and mainstream sycophant.   
      
   People don't turn into birds.   
      
      
   >>>>>>And no, don't wiggle your way out the usual way, suggesting   
   >>>>>>I'm too lazy to find one myself.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>You are lazy, two minute Google result believer.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Wiggle wiggle wiggle.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>You can't face the truth.   
   >>   
   >>Try me.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Just another troll attempt.   
      
   Above you said you like challenges. Put me face to face with your   
   truth and let me take a swing at it.   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>>>>Also, this is not about what my   
   >>>>>>sources have to say, it's all about /your/ sources.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>But your sources are lying/suppressing crap. That's the real issue.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You're the one making the claim, therefore you provide the evidence.   
   >>>>This can't be a new concept to you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>No I'm just passing on 'claims' by investigators and official witnesses.   
   >>>You obviously live in a very small world.   
   >>   
   >>Appeal to authorities noted.   
   >>   
   >   
   >What level of authority are they?   
      
   In your world they are the highest level possible. You believe what   
   they say 'unseen'. Remember, you once ADMITTED!!! that you yourself   
   never have seen a bona fide alien, 'negative' or otherwise, but you   
   are sure they do exist... here on Earth. It's basically a question of   
   faith.   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>>>>So, do you have an 'upgraded source' that provides evidence for the   
   >>>>>>retrieval of a crashed craft created by an alien race?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I have plenty ...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>So you say, but are unable to provide any. I call your bluff... again.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>So you want me to waste more time on the likes of you? Why?   
   >>   
   >>Ask yourself why you're responding to my posts in the first place.   
   >>   
   >   
   >It's an interesting challenge, ...   
      
   You just called it a waste of time.   
      
   >... and an opportunity to put clowns/jerks in   
   >their places, ...   
      
   An opportunity wasted.   
      
   > ... and inform them of the gov psyops and narrative programs that   
   >>have been in place for decades.   
      
   Millennia! Who do you think build the Pyramids?   
      
      
   >>>>> ... but you will never search for yourself and switch. ...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I can find hundreds, if not thousands, of people saying the same shit   
   >>>>you do,   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Military officials talk shit? Ok smarty.   
   >>   
   >>Another appeal to authorities.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Diversion   
      
   Au contraire. It's a direct attack on the quality of your argument.   
   You're saying that I, just like you do, should believe the claims,   
   because they are also made by "military officials", and people in that   
   position would not "talk shit".   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>Do you now believe everything "military   
   >>officials" say?   
   >>   
   >   
   >Of course not.   
   >Have you checked them out at all?   
   >And do you just believe the gov and media narratives?   
      
   "Just", as in 'only', or 'unquestioningly'? In either case, no.   
      
   >>   
   >>>>all claiming to have the evidence. Grainy images of out of   
   >>>>focus gray blobs, un-named specialists and insiders spilling the   
   >>>>beans, ancient wisdom, inter stellar revelations, anecdotal evidence   
   >>>>of abductions, and of course, 'They are hiding the truth from us'.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>So you still don't know why the military and governments hide things from   
   >>>the population? Are you dumb?   
   >>   
   >>If they are hiding all the good stuff how have you learned about it?   
   >>   
   >   
   >By looking at sources other than the narratives. The cover ups are quite   
   >obvious.   
      
   Especially when you know they are cover ups.   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>What material have you gained access to? Material that I also could   
   >>find on the internet... if I weren't so lazy.   
   >>   
   >   
   >More than I could post. Most I no longer have.   
      
   What a shame. What a god damned shame! Not even one single link, just   
   to give me an idea of what you have? Nothing left at all?   
      
   >Do you want some? ...   
      
   Whatever gave you that idea?   
      
   > ... First you have to convince me that you're sincere and open   
   >minded and not just a sheep, clown and troll.   
      
   And I would rip every- and anything you'd post to pieces. You know it.   
   If you trusted your sources, your ideas, and your arguments, you would   
   bury me under them. But what we get instead are the same lazy   
   arguments for not posting what I ask to see.   
      
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>They put strict laws in place. Find out why and then come back.   
   >>   
   >>Name one law They have put in place.   
   >>'§1: Keep the alien spaceships hidden from the gullible masses.'   
   >>   
   >   
   >In 1969, NASA passed a federal regulation dealing with ‘Extra-terrestrial   
   >Exposure’. The “Extraterrestrial Exposure Law” offers a legal precedent for   
   >the detention and indefinite imprisonment of any individual who comes into   
   >contact with extraterrestrials.   
      
   What kind of extraterrestrial 'material' do you believe it was thought   
   someone could be exposed to?   
      
   I've never heard of this, so I'll do some digging.   
      
   Before I start, I think it is about procedure in case of the Apollo 11   
   crew's and future astronauts' exposure to something   
   'extraterrestrial'. Keeping us all safe from E.T. But we'll see. I'll   
   start by 'researching' “Extraterrestrial Exposure Law”.   
      
   [clickity clickity]   
      
   https://tinyurl.com/54jchbte   
      
   This is what you are talking about, right? Easy peasy.   
      
   By the way, it's not a law per se.   
   ***   
   PART 1211-EXTRATERRESTRIAL   
   EXPOSURE   
      
   § 1211.100 Scope.   
   This part establishes: (a) NASA   
   policy, responsibility and authority to   
   guard the Earth against any harmful   
   contamination or adverse changes in its   
   environment resulting from personnel,   
   spacecraft and other property returning   
   to the Earth after landing on or coming within the atmospheric   
   envelope of a celestial body; and (b) security requirements,   
   restrictions and safeguards that are necessary in the interest of the   
   national security.   
   [...]   
   ***   
      
   Told ya!   
      
   It's an easy read, and as expected, it is nothing like you described   
   it. Prove me wrong. Quotes from the link is a must. Think of it as "an   
   interesting challenge". You like challenges, remember.   
      
   I can start and show you what I mean. You stated that   
      
   "The “Extraterrestrial Exposure Law” offers a legal precedent for   
   the detention and indefinite imprisonment of any individual who comes   
   into contact with extraterrestrials."   
      
   Where in the text do they talk about potential "indefinite   
   imprisonment"? The Apollo 11 crew spent three weeks in quarantine   
   AFAIR.   
      
   And where do they use the precise term "extraterrestrials".   
      
   I am convinced that you never have read full text before. If you had,   
   you wouldn't have misquoted the name of the text. Also, I'm sure you   
   copy pasted your paragraph about the wrongly named “Extraterrestrial   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)