[continued from previous message]   
      
   >> ... and inform them of the gov psyops and narrative programs that   
   >>>have been in place for decades.   
   >   
   >Millennia! Who do you think build the Pyramids?   
   >   
      
   Humans with advanced tech.   
      
      
   >   
   >>>>>> ... but you will never search for yourself and switch. ...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I can find hundreds, if not thousands, of people saying the same shit   
   >>>>>you do,   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Military officials talk shit? Ok smarty.   
   >>>   
   >>>Another appeal to authorities.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Diversion   
   >   
   >Au contraire. It's a direct attack on the quality of your argument.   
   >You're saying that I, just like you do, should believe the claims,   
   >because they are also made by "military officials", and people in that   
   >position would not "talk shit".   
   >>   
      
   The difference is I look at decades of info and documented evidence and   
   research. I don't just believe one or two officials. You're the believer   
   type here.   
      
      
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>Do you now believe everything "military   
   >>>officials" say?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Of course not.   
   >>Have you checked them out at all?   
   >>And do you just believe the gov and media narratives?   
   >   
   >"Just", as in 'only', or 'unquestioningly'? In either case, no.   
   >   
      
   You dodged the first question.   
   You don't go far enough with questioning them. You mainly only question the   
   easy fun side. Fun and laziness do not get truth or facts.   
      
      
   >>>   
   >>>>>all claiming to have the evidence. Grainy images of out of   
   >>>>>focus gray blobs, un-named specialists and insiders spilling the   
   >>>>>beans, ancient wisdom, inter stellar revelations, anecdotal evidence   
   >>>>>of abductions, and of course, 'They are hiding the truth from us'.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>So you still don't know why the military and governments hide things   
   >>>>from   
   >>>>the population? Are you dumb?   
   >>>   
   >>>If they are hiding all the good stuff how have you learned about it?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>By looking at sources other than the narratives. The cover ups are quite   
   >>obvious.   
   >   
   >Especially when you know they are cover ups.   
   >>   
      
   After all the research on militaries and governments and their motives it   
   becomes pretty clear. Why didn't you put two and two together?   
      
      
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>What material have you gained access to? Material that I also could   
   >>>find on the internet... if I weren't so lazy.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>More than I could post. Most I no longer have.   
   >   
   >What a shame. What a god damned shame! Not even one single link, just   
   >to give me an idea of what you have? Nothing left at all?   
   >   
      
   Yes nothing left for you to ridicule like a troll.   
      
      
   >   
   >>Do you want some? ...   
   >   
   >Whatever gave you that idea?   
   >   
   >   
   >> ... First you have to convince me that you're sincere and open   
   >>minded and not just a sheep, clown and troll.   
   >   
   >And I would rip every- and anything you'd post to pieces. You know it.   
   >   
      
   Without even any info on the subject? Haha. Loser.   
      
      
   >   
   >If you trusted your sources, your ideas, and your arguments, you would   
   >bury me under them.   
   >   
      
   I trust no one. And I don't trust you.   
      
      
   >   
   >But what we get instead are the same lazy   
   >arguments for not posting what I ask to see.   
   >   
      
   Your type always wants something. And has big dumb opinions. But contributes   
   and knows nothing.   
      
      
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>They put strict laws in place. Find out why and then come back.   
   >>>   
   >>>Name one law They have put in place.   
   >>>'§1: Keep the alien spaceships hidden from the gullible masses.'   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>In 1969, NASA passed a federal regulation dealing with ‘Extra-terrestrial   
   >>Exposure’. The “Extraterrestrial Exposure Law” offers a legal precedent   
   >>for   
   >>the detention and indefinite imprisonment of any individual who comes into   
   >>contact with extraterrestrials.   
   >   
   >What kind of extraterrestrial 'material' do you believe it was thought   
   >someone could be exposed to?   
   >   
   >I've never heard of this, so I'll do some digging.   
   >   
   >Before I start, I think it is about procedure in case of the Apollo 11   
   >crew's and future astronauts' exposure to something   
   >'extraterrestrial'. Keeping us all safe from E.T. But we'll see. I'll   
   >start by 'researching' “Extraterrestrial Exposure Law”.   
   >   
   >[clickity clickity]   
   >   
   >https://tinyurl.com/54jchbte   
   >   
   >This is what you are talking about, right? Easy peasy.   
   >   
   >By the way, it's not a law per se.   
   >***   
   >PART 1211-EXTRATERRESTRIAL   
   >EXPOSURE   
   >   
   >§ 1211.100 Scope.   
   >This part establishes: (a) NASA   
   >policy, responsibility and authority to   
   >guard the Earth against any harmful   
   >contamination or adverse changes in its   
   >environment resulting from personnel,   
   >spacecraft and other property returning   
   >to the Earth after landing on or coming within the atmospheric   
   >envelope of a celestial body; and (b) security requirements,   
   >restrictions and safeguards that are necessary in the interest of the   
   >national security.   
   >[...]   
   >***   
   >   
      
   There's never been any evidence of any contamination. Why make a document   
   like that? People have been arrested.   
      
      
   >   
   >Told ya!   
   >   
   >It's an easy read, and as expected, it is nothing like you described   
   >it. Prove me wrong. Quotes from the link is a must. Think of it as "an   
   >interesting challenge". You like challenges, remember.   
   >   
      
   If it was easy and quick then it wasn't a challenge. You did practically   
   nothing and then gloated.   
      
      
   >   
   >I can start and show you what I mean. You stated that   
   >   
   >"The “Extraterrestrial Exposure Law” offers a legal precedent for   
   >the detention and indefinite imprisonment of any individual who comes   
   >into contact with extraterrestrials."   
   >   
   >Where in the text do they talk about potential "indefinite   
   >imprisonment"? The Apollo 11 crew spent three weeks in quarantine   
   >AFAIR.   
   >   
   >And where do they use the precise term "extraterrestrials".   
   >   
   >I am convinced that you never have read full text before. If you had,   
   >you wouldn't have misquoted the name of the text. Also, I'm sure you   
   >copy pasted your paragraph about the wrongly named “Extraterrestrial   
   >Exposure Law” and that it is all you know about.   
   >>   
      
   You're out of your depth.   
      
      
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>Understand that I'm interested in learning what /you/ have found and   
   >>>>>where you found it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Yes you're obsessed about that. I get it. ...   
   >>>   
   >>>I really don't think you do.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>So you're a very seasoned troll? Professional perhaps?   
   >   
   >I don't troll. I poke.   
   >   
      
   You have no good reason.   
      
      
   >   
   >>>> ... Your emotions just can't handle   
   >>>>'claims'. Get therapy.   
   >>>   
   >>>If therapy would make me believe stories about alien abductions and   
   >>>captured spaceships, I'd rather stay... 'emotional' regarding those   
   >>>things.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>No not just believe. Why is it always just a case of believe or not   
   >>believe   
   >>with you? That's for sheep and followers.   
   >   
   >It's not always about that. But in case of the existence of aliens   
   >here on Earth it is. You believe, I don't.   
   >>   
      
   I consider and research, not just believe. That's your paradigm.   
   You still don't get this.   
      
      
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> ... You're not   
   >>>>>>interested.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Of course I'm interested. I ask you for an answer every time. What   
   >>>>>evidence have /you/ seen?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I've seen a few craft, in one case a cluster of them go across the sky.   
   >>>>That   
   >>>>was before satellite clusters.   
   >>>   
   >>>Thank you. I'm now totally convinced that aliens from space have   
   >>>visited Earth. Just like I'm convinced that Elvis didn't die. And that   
   >>>Bigfoot is on the loose... somewhere out there.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Simpleton. You just want someone to come along and convince you. ...   
   >   
   >As I said above: "I really don't think you do." 'Get it', that is.   
   >   
   >> ... And it has   
   >>to be an authority, that or nothing.   
   >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)