Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.ufo.reports    |    The latest from planet crackpot    |    8,965 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,874 of 8,965    |
|    JTEM to jojo    |
|    Re: NASA caught LYING TO YOU again!    |
|    29 Jul 25 14:02:29    |
      XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.alien.research       From: jtem01@gmail.com              On 7/29/25 11:30 AM, jojo wrote:              > doesnt look like it.              You know what it looks like? Mental illness.              #1. I said that the Dimethyl sulfide in question was already       confirmed. It was detected and later detected again. AND I       said that the claim here wasn't that NASA found no evidence       for it but, no "Strong" evidence. Which means that their       findings were CONSISTENT WITH Dimethyl sulfide, rather than       excluding it.              Any dispute? Any word addressing this at all?              Nope.              #2. I said that Dimethyl sulfide was not the only biosignature       detected. There were others. I said that Dimethyl sulfide was       so important because there are no non-biological sources.              Any dispute? Was a single word acknowledged or addressed?              Nope.              #3. I said that NASA, besides NOT claiming that they found no       evidence for it, merely no "Strong" evidence," dismissed this       Dimethyl sulfide as something that could have come from a simple       chemical reaction. But, this is wrong because, as I already       pointed out, as far as we know the only known sources are       biological.              Any dispute? Was this addressed at all? Was it acknowledged?              Nope.              #4. I said that this was consistent. That, NASA is consistent       in it's denials of evidence for life outside the earth, and       even misinforming the public on the subject. I reiterated facts       raised in a previous thread regarding the Mars lander and the       supposed search for life there.              Any dispute? Was there so much as a single counter example? Any       attempt to address this fact at all?              Nope.                            I get that people can /Like/ a particular answer over others,       but that's not even the problem here. This thread is about me       raising facts that should set off alarm bells in any so called       "Skeptic," while the collective spasms & tries to stop any       conversation it is unable to control.                                                                      --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca