XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/29/2025 1:02 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 7/29/25 11:30 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >   
   >> doesnt look like it.   
   >   
   > You know what it looks like?  Mental illness.   
   >   
   > #1.  I said that the Dimethyl sulfide in question was already   
   > confirmed. It was detected and later detected again. AND I   
   > said that the claim here wasn't that NASA found no evidence   
   > for it but, no "Strong" evidence. Which means that their   
   > findings were CONSISTENT WITH Dimethyl sulfide, rather than   
   > excluding it.   
   >   
   > Any dispute? Any word addressing this at all?   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
   > #2.  I said that Dimethyl sulfide was not the only biosignature   
   > detected. There were others. I said that Dimethyl sulfide was   
   > so important because there are no non-biological sources.   
   >   
   > Any dispute? Was a single word acknowledged or addressed?   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
   > #3.  I said that NASA, besides NOT claiming that they found no   
   > evidence for it, merely no "Strong" evidence," dismissed this   
   > Dimethyl sulfide as something that could have come from a simple   
   > chemical reaction. But, this is wrong because, as I already   
   > pointed out, as far as we know the only known sources are   
   > biological.   
   >   
   > Any dispute? Was this addressed at all? Was it acknowledged?   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
   > #4.  I said that this was consistent. That, NASA is consistent   
   > in it's denials of evidence for life outside the earth, and   
   > even misinforming the public on the subject. I reiterated facts   
   > raised in a previous thread regarding the Mars lander and the   
   > supposed search for life there.   
   >   
   > Any dispute? Was there so much as a single counter example? Any   
   > attempt to address this fact at all?   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > I get that people can  /Like/  a particular answer over others,   
   > but that's not even the problem here. This thread is about me   
   > raising facts that should set off alarm bells in any so called   
   > "Skeptic," while the collective spasms & tries to stop any   
   > conversation it is unable to control.   
   >   
      
   Then type all of this up in a manuscript and you can submit it here today:   
      
   https://arxiv.org/   
      
   You'll get timely feedback from experts.  I am not an expert, and few   
   here are experts, either.  Please get back to us when your paper is   
   online and also when you get any feedback.  Be sure to include links.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   P.S.  Sorry for any double post; my earlier version went off to "never,   
   never land".   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)