XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/29/2025 1:02 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 7/29/25 11:30 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >   
   >> doesnt look like it.   
   >   
   > You know what it looks like?  Mental illness.   
   >   
   > #1.  I said that the Dimethyl sulfide in question was already   
   > confirmed. It was detected and later detected again. AND I   
   > said that the claim here wasn't that NASA found no evidence   
   > for it but, no "Strong" evidence. Which means that their   
   > findings were CONSISTENT WITH Dimethyl sulfide, rather than   
   > excluding it.   
   >   
   > Any dispute? Any word addressing this at all?   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
   > #2.  I said that Dimethyl sulfide was not the only biosignature   
   > detected. There were others. I said that Dimethyl sulfide was   
   > so important because there are no non-biological sources.   
   >   
   > Any dispute? Was a single word acknowledged or addressed?   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
   > #3.  I said that NASA, besides NOT claiming that they found no   
   > evidence for it, merely no "Strong" evidence," dismissed this   
   > Dimethyl sulfide as something that could have come from a simple   
   > chemical reaction. But, this is wrong because, as I already   
   > pointed out, as far as we know the only known sources are   
   > biological.   
   >   
   > Any dispute? Was this addressed at all? Was it acknowledged?   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
   > #4.  I said that this was consistent. That, NASA is consistent   
   > in it's denials of evidence for life outside the earth, and   
   > even misinforming the public on the subject. I reiterated facts   
   > raised in a previous thread regarding the Mars lander and the   
   > supposed search for life there.   
   >   
   > Any dispute? Was there so much as a single counter example? Any   
   > attempt to address this fact at all?   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > I get that people can  /Like/  a particular answer over others,   
   > but that's not even the problem here. This thread is about me   
   > raising facts that should set off alarm bells in any so called   
   > "Skeptic," while the collective spasms & tries to stop any   
   > conversation it is unable to control.   
   >   
      
   Then type all of this up and submit it as a manuscript; here's one place   
   that you can go to today:   
      
   https://arxiv.org/   
      
   You'll get fairly prompt feedback from experts.  I am not an expert;   
   few, if any others here, are experts either.  Get back to us when your   
   paper is online and any replies that you receive; please be sure to   
   include links.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)