XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/3/25 11:55 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
      
   > Dimethyl sulfide has been detected in comets   
      
   Lol!  Been on a lot of comets, huh?   
      
   This comet theory is fascinating for a number of reasons.   
   The first is that Dimethyl sulfide does not stay in an   
   atmosphere for long, so if it came from a comet it would   
   have to be recent. It would also have to be a BIG comet,   
   absolutely huge...   
      
   This claim of finding it in a comet though mirrors other   
   claims. For instance, there was a 100% fool proof test   
   for settling all arguments over whether or not 3 billlion   
   year old plus structures inside of rocks are fossils or   
   just rocks. And they found that they were indeed fossils!   
   Until the famous Mar's Rock passed the same test. Oh,   
   the test on the earth rocks in still fool proof though...   
      
   But it's just stupid. Nobody would have a problem with   
   the idea of Dimethyl sulfide being found in comets, the   
   same way our water is, but, again, it would need to be   
   VERY recent and it would need to be HUGE.   
      
   > [24] IT HAS ALSO BEEN SYNTHESIZED ABIOTICALLY IN   
   > THE LABORATORY.   
      
   Which requires biology. This is something you would already know   
   if you had reading comprehension:  A human, a living thing is   
   what synthesized it!   
      
   > [25] For comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, the European   
   > Space Agency sampled the cloud of dust and gas shed from the comet.   
      
   This is just repeating the same claim you made earlier.   
      
   It's padding...   
      
   >[24]   
   > [26] DIMETHYL SULFIDE HAS ALSO BEEN MADE ABIOTICALLY IN LABORATORIES   
      
   And this was the second claim that you made.   
      
   You're pretending to have made four points when you didn't.   
      
   >[27] These comet-based discoveries contradict   
   > the suggestion that dimethyl sulfide is an indicator of life on other   
   > planets.[28][25][29][30]   
      
   No they don't. They can't. For starters, if they meant that much   
   you wouldn't have repeated them, pretending you have four points.   
   Secondly, it is a biosignature, it is evidence for life. And what's   
   more, together with other biosignatures it's very good evidence.   
   Being retarded, you think something all by itself has to be rock   
   solid proof or it isn't evidence. Well it is evidence. And it's   
   very strong evidence.   
      
   > The James Webb Space Telescope has possibly detected evidence of DMS in   
   > the atmosphere of the exoplanet K2-18b.[31][32][33][34]   
      
   Several reviews have confirmed it, and even NASA in it's denial   
   doesn't exclude it.   
      
   Which means it was found three times, at least.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)