XPost: comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-11   
   From: robin_listas@es.invalid   
      
   On 2025-12-23 07:14, c186282 wrote:   
   > On 12/22/25 07:56, The Natural Philosopher wrote:   
   >> On 21/12/2025 21:39, c186282 wrote:   
      
   ...   
      
      
   >> There is no time :-)   
   >   
   >    Maybe not - and I listed a few concerns that make   
   >    me doubt 'time' ... or at least our traditional   
   >    view of it.   
   >   
   >    However that's "big picture" ... if you stand in   
   >    the middle of the motorway then that oncoming   
   >    lorry WILL run you down in a very predictable   
   >    number of seconds. The 'small picture' WILL getcha.   
   >   
   >    Likely at every dimension there's a very different   
   >    sort of "small picture", what is 'real', in a   
   >    practical sort of way. Doesn't matter if those   
   >    dimensions have deflated to micrometer thickness,   
   >    you'd never notice it.   
   >   
   >    I guess D-4 will eventually deflate to effectual   
   >    nothingness - which MAY totally trash a lot of   
   >    QM-related physics and turn our kind of dimension   
   >    into naught but photons or less. Without a   
   >    'super-channel/dimension' the entanglement resolution   
   >    trick won't work anymore and likely LOTS of other   
   >    important things  :-)   
   >   
   >    But it won't happen tomorrow.   
   >   
   >    But EVENTUALLY ... 'we'/whatever had better have a   
   >    damned good escape plan.   
   >   
   >    Before THAT ... Andromeda IS gonna shred/super-heat   
   >    OUR galaxy in about 4 billion years. Work on THAT   
   >    escape plan FIRST ! What's the nearest 'safe'   
   >    galaxy ?   
   >   
   Pierson's Puppeteers come to mind.   
      
   --   
   Cheers, Carlos.   
   ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)