Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.unix.geeks    |    The gathering of the socially-retarded    |    298 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 296 of 298    |
|    Lars Poulsen to All    |
|    LVM partitioning questions    |
|    07 Feb 26 13:27:56    |
      From: lars@beagle-ears.com              In my recent (still somewhat incomplete) system rebuild and upgrade,       I came across a question I never encountered before.              As I was preparing a couple of 2-TB drives, it was clear that I wanted       each of them to be a PV (physical volume) with a single VolGroup per       drive. I also thought I wanted them to use a GPT partition table.       But when I did the "pvcreate", I accidentally specified /dev/sdx       instead of /dev/pvx1, and the PV's volume table replaced the GPT.       Everything seems to work fiine that way. I don't expect to ever use       the drive with any other OS, so Windows compatibility should not       be a problem.              Should I just leave it that way, or might something bite me in the       butt at some later point in time?              And by the way, does a modern BIOS understand LVM natively?              Can it find bootable volumes directly in the PV/VG/LV structure?              Does it matter for this question whether there is a single-partition       GPT under the LVM structures (does it make it better or worse ?) ?              Will "anaconda" have trouble working with the no-GPT version?       --       Lars Poulsen - an old geek in Santa Barbara, California              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca