Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.war.civil.usa    |    Discussing American civil war.. and 2.0    |    44,056 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,714 of 44,056    |
|    Ryan to All    |
|    Bad News For Trump: He's indicted again     |
|    17 Sep 24 03:20:53    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, mn.politics, alt.fun       XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics       From: X@Y.com              Trump indicted again in election subversion case brought by Jack Smith              The 36-page indictment, secured Tuesday by the special counsel, is an       attempt to recalibrate the case after the Supreme Court’s immunity       decision.              A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C. has reindicted Donald Trump on       four felony charges related to his effort to subvert the 2020 presidential       election.              The 36-page indictment, secured Tuesday by special counsel Jack Smith, is       an attempt by prosecutors to streamline the case against Trump to address       the Supreme Court’s ruling last month that concluded presidents enjoy       sweeping immunity from prosecution for their official conduct.              The new indictment removes some specific allegations against Trump but       contains the same four criminal charges, including conspiracy to defraud       the United States. It’s a signal that Smith believes the high court’s       immunity decision doesn’t pose a major impediment to convicting the former       president.              “The superseding indictment, which was presented to a new grand jury that       had not previously heard evidence in this case, reflects the Government’s       efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand       instructions,” Smith’s team wrote in an accompanying court filing.              The development is unlikely to alter the reality that a trial in the case       before the November election looks impossible. In fact, the new indictment       could drag the case out further — defense attorneys often seek delays after       prosecutors revise criminal allegations.              Both sides face a Friday deadline to propose next steps to U.S. District       Judge Tanya Chutkan, the Biden appointee who is overseeing the proceedings       in the trial court. Chutkan has scheduled a Sept. 5 hearing to set a course       for the case.              Trump pleaded not guilty to the initial indictment and has repeatedly       decried the prosecution as a political vendetta. After the new indictment       was unveiled on Tuesday, Trump called it “ridiculous” in a post on his       social media site, Truth Social.              “For them to do this immediately after our Supreme Court Victory on       Immunity and more, is shocking,” Trump wrote.              The new charging document seeks to revive a case that was stalled for       months while the Supreme Court weighed Trump’s immunity arguments. In a       largely 6-3 decision on July 1, the high court announced a robust version       of presidential immunity that made clear that at least some of the special       counsel’s allegations could not proceed — and left the rest of the case in       jeopardy.              The new indictment seeks to rely on a distinction the Supreme Court drew       between a president’s private actions (which can be the subject of criminal       charges) and actions that stem from a president’s official powers (which       now carry a large degree of immunity).              In an apparent bid to downplay any connection between Trump’s official       duties and his bid to overturn Joe Biden’s victory, the new indictment       repeatedly emphasizes the political and personal nature of many of the       actions Trump took during the post-election period and on Jan. 6, 2021.              For instance, the document underscores that Mike Pence was not only vice       president, but also Trump’s “running mate,” when Trump pressured Pence to       block the certification of the election results. It notes that Trump’s       rally at the Ellipse on Jan. 6, 2021, was “privately funded” and “privately       organized.” And it stresses that Trump often used his Twitter account for       “personal purposes.”              The new document also eliminates a long list of top government officials       who had informed Trump that his claims about election fraud and anomalies       were false, including top intelligence, Justice Department, homeland       security officials and White House lawyers.              Smith’s original 45-page indictment, unveiled last August, included claims       that Trump sought to use the Justice Department to advance what prosecutors       contend was an unlawful and fraudulent effort to overturn the election.       Those details, which the Supreme Court put largely beyond the reach of       prosecutors, have been omitted from the new, shorter charging document.              The new indictment adds no new defendants, but deletes all references to       one alleged co-conspirator mentioned in the earlier indictment without       being named or charged: former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark.              Clark held a Senate-confirmed post as head of DOJ’s Environmental and       Natural Resources Division and was serving as the acting head of the       department’s Civil Division at the end of the Trump administration when       Trump considered a plan to install Clark to replace acting Attorney General       Jeffrey Rosen.              Witnesses told a House investigation that, in the weeks after the 2020       election, Rosen and other Trump appointees had refused to send letters to       local election officials claiming fraud in the presidential election       results, but Clark was willing to do so. Trump ultimately abandoned the       plan after nearly all of the senior leaders of the Justice Department said       they would resign in protest.              In addition to the election subversion case, Smith has also charged Trump       in Florida with hoarding classified documents and obstructing justice.       Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, dismissed that case last month — a       decision that Smith is appealing.              Trump also faces criminal charges in Georgia for interfering with the 2020       election results in that state. And in May, he was convicted in New York of       falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment to a porn       star.       https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/27/trump-indicted-2020-election-       subversion-00176503              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca