Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.war.civil.usa    |    Discussing American civil war.. and 2.0    |    44,056 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 42,842 of 44,056    |
|    Henry Bodkin to All    |
|    Feeble Old Insane Felon Trump's failed p    |
|    01 Oct 24 17:01:54    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, mn.politics, alt.politics.republicans       XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics       From: X@Y.com              Trump’s failed presidency              Trump’s presidency is failing rapidly. Like others before him, modern       American presidents fail when they cannot master or comprehend the       government that they inherit. This is a hard concept to grasp in an age       when non-stop media coverage leads us to focus on the president’s       communication skills and when presidents themselves value spin more than       expertise. But in the end presidential failure is about reality, not       words—no matter how lofty and inspiring or how crude and insulting.              Contemporary presidents are especially prone to mistaking spin for       reality for several reasons. First of all, they are nominated not by       other elected officials who have some sense of what it takes to govern,       but by activists and party electorates who value inspiration and       entertainment. Second, the importance of mass communication leads       presidents to believe that the words and activities that got them into       office can work once they are in office: more rallies, more speeches,       more tweets, and more television advertising.              Nothing can be further from the truth.              Presidential scholars have been aware of the disjuncture between       campaigning and governing for some time now. More than a decade ago, Sam       Kernell wrote a book called Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential       Leadership (CQ Press, 2007), in which he showed that beginning with       President Kennedy, modern presidents spent a great deal more time on       minor presidential addresses and on domestic and international travel       than their predecessors. All this communication, he argued, came at the       expense of actual governing. Later on another presidential scholar,       George C. Edwards III, writing in Overreach, Leadership in the Obama       Presidency (Princeton University Press, 2012) argued that Obama thought       he could go directly to the public to get support for his programs, an       approach that placed communication over negotiation and that resulted in       a stunning midterm loss for his party.              Reality still matters, and spin has its limits—even in an era of social       media.              As long as things are going okay for most people, Americans tolerate a       president’s verbal gymnastics. But when people are in trouble, even the       most ardent government haters ask that famous question: “Where’s the       government?” And for most Americans, the president is the government.       Following the botched federal response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the       collateral damage to the presidency of George W. Bush was extensive. His       popularity never recovered and his second-term agenda, including bold       changes to Social Security, was destroyed. Nearly a decade later when       President Obama rolled out his signature achievement, the Affordable Care       Act, the hugely embarrassing crashing of the computer systems meant to       implement the act increased Republican opposition to it and undermined       public confidence in the government’s ability to implement important       executive actions.              Trump’s failures during the coronavirus pandemic run the gamut from the       rhetorical to the organizational. Every time the president speaks he       seems to add to the fear and chaos surrounding the situation: telling       Americans it was not serious by asserting his “hunches” about data,       assuring people that everyone would be tested even when there were very       few tests available, telling people that we are very close to a vaccine       when it is anywhere from 12 to 18 months away, mistakenly asserting that       goods as well as people from Europe would be forbidden from entering the       United States, and announcing that Google had a website for testing while       the initiative was merely an unimplemented idea, were just a few of his       televised gaffes. After every presidential statement, “clarifications”       were needed. Trump has the unique distinction of giving a national       address meant to calm the country that had the effect of taking the stock       market down over 1,000 points.              We have come to expect verbal imprecision and outright lies from this       president, but that is more easily corrected on less momentous       developments. When there is fundamental incompetence on matters of       tremendous importance, voters punish poor results. And this is where       Trump’s actions on the coronavirus have gone far off target. One of the       most glaring deficiencies of his administration has been the failure to       have enough tests available to identify those infected and to screen       others for possible exposure. South Korea, a country a fraction of the       size of the United States, is testing thousands more people a day than       the United States. The failure to produce tests quickly will go down as       one of the biggest failures in the overall handling of this disease       because it prevented authorities from understanding the scope of the       pandemic and therefore made it difficult for them to undertake       appropriate steps to mitigate its spread. Other countries had tests and       now state governments are rapidly rolling out their own tests after the       CDC belatedly removed regulatory barriers. Even the nation’s chief       infectious disease doctor, Anthony Fauci, has admitted that testing is a       major failure—a statement that is most certainly not one of the       president’s talking points.              In this and other areas, Trump has failed to learn from the failures of       his predecessors. When President Ronald Reagan signed into law the       fundamental restructuring of the military known as the Goldwater-Nichols       reforms,[1] he did this knowing that he did not want a military fiasco on       his watch like the failed Iranian rescue mission that did in Jimmy       Carter’s presidency. And following the total breakdown in the Federal       Emergency Management Agency’s handling of Hurricane Katrina, President       Barack Obama made sure his FEMA director was an experienced state       emergency management director. He knew that poor performance during       natural disasters would doom his presidency.              During the Obama Administration, the White House dealt with a precursor       of the coronavirus: the Ebola virus. While the scrambling eventually       worked out thanks to decisive executive office leadership, it illustrated       that pandemics were a fundamental national security threat. They created       the Global Health Security Team in the National Security Council to       prepare. In May of 2018, Trump disbanded the team allegedly because he       never thought pandemics would happen and because “I’m a business person.       I don’t like having thousands of people around when you don’t need them.”       Trump’s hurried justification for abandoning a unit (that was well short       of thousands) showed Trump’s limited understanding of why government is       different from business—it is in the business of preparing for low-       probability events. For instance, the United States military spends              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca