Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1891  |
|  mark lewis to Wilfred van Velzen  |
|  Re: AMIGA Moderator?  |
|  16 May 20 17:07:52  |
 TZUTC: -0400 MSGID: 329.fido-amiga@1:3634/12 23258d71 REPLY: 2:280/464 5ec018ee PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux May 5 2020 GCC 7.5.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.172 May 5 2020 GCC 7.5.0 CHRS: ASCII 1 NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104 Re: Re: AMIGA Moderator? By: Wilfred van Velzen to mark lewis on Sat May 16 2020 18:46:17 ml>>> how can it be hijacked if it is not listed and doesn't have a ml>>> moderator? you cannot have it both ways ;) WvV>>> He posted area rules as moderator out of the blue, without even WvV>>> consulting the area participants first. I call that hijacking... ml>> moderators do not have to consult anyone about anything regarding their echo ;) WvV> He never was the moderator... he was when he relisted it since it had fallen off the echolist back in ~2003... for an area to be carried on the backbone, it needs to be listed in the echolist and have a moderator... that means that the area was non-existant until he brought it back... if there was another area of the same name that someone cross linked to this one, then that's a different problem... one that should have been straightened out back then... if the area is not listed and has no moderator, then it will be removed from the backbone distribution when backbone.na is updated... so, is it to be listed and carried by the backbone or no? )\/(ark --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12) SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 18/0 90/1 116/116 120/340 601 123/0 25 50 120 131 SEEN-BY: 123/150 170 755 135/300 153/757 7715 154/10 50 226/16 30 SEEN-BY: 227/114 702 229/101 275 424 426 664 1014 240/5832 249/1 206 SEEN-BY: 249/307 317 400 261/38 292/854 300/4 317/3 322/757 342/200 SEEN-BY: 633/280 3634/0 12 15 27 50 PATH: 3634/12 154/10 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]