home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 161 
 Ed Vance to MARK LEWIS 
 Slow XP 
 02 Aug 12 22:09:00 
 
ML>ML> EV> Because this XP MCE 2005 SP3 computer has been acting very
ML>ML> EV> slow I ran one pass of MEMTEST-86 v4.0a yesterday on it.

ML>ML>is that memtest-86 or memtest-86+ ?? there is a huge difference...
ML>ML>always use the + version...

ML> EV> I never heard of memtest-86+.

ML>i think i made a mistake on the name... there's no '-' in it...

ML> EV> I downloaded it but haven't used it yet to check the RAM.

ML>memtest86+ is done by another author when the original author of memtest86
ML>wasn't doing anything for a while and it needed to be updated... until the +
ML>version came out, i used the original but ever since, it has always been the
ML>version...

Mark,

I ran MEMTEST86+ for 4 hours today, 2 passes were completed and I
stopped it during the third pass.

My memory (RAM) didn't have any errors.

The reason I downloaded the MEMTEST-86 the other day was because I had
an older version I downloaded in 2007 so I thought to get an updated
copy before I run it on this vintage 2006 box.

Thanks for telling me about the + program the other fellow wrote, I
wouldn't had know about it since I never heard of anything other than
MEMTEST-86.  I have always liked good utility software, even back in the
1980's when I used the C=64 and a friend downloaded a program called
UTLWDG from Compuserve.

ML>i also run it off of a bootable live linux CD... i use ubuntu here and it
has
ML>it on the live CD as a menu option... when the CD comes up, it offers a
ML>language choice... i hit ESC there most of the time to keep the default and
ML>then arrow down two or three times to run memtest86+ for several full
rounds.
ML>there are numerous tests per round...

I have seen the MEMTEST option when I live booted Ubuntu 7.04 but never
ran it, I only wanted to run it last/this month because of my paranoia
problem of wondering if my computer is being ran by outside forces.

McAfee scans have only reported PUPs about some of the software I
installed from reputable sources recommended by people I think are
knowageable about this stuff.

McAfee still finds hp's KILLWIND.EXE and the next time it lets me tell
it that I believe it should be trusted I will click that button so it
won't bother me about that anymore.

Thanks for the help, at least I found out the RAM isn't the problem.


 * SLMR 2.1a #T348 * Brain: The apparatus with which we think we think.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux
 * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca