Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 7611  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Maurice Kinal  |
|  Re: some call me ... tim?  |
|  02 Dec 20 17:34:07  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 5fc7c201 REPLY: 1:153/7001 5fc7b5b0 Hi Maurice, On 2020-12-02 15:41:36, you wrote to me: MK> @MSGID: 1:153/7001 5fc7b5b0 MK> @REPLY: 2:280/464 5fc76588 WvV>> I would call it broken, with only the MSGID flag... MK> No more broken than with all the additional flags. Note that this reply MK> contains a REPLY flag that matches your MSGID as per specs, as well as MK> nonconforming MSGIDs that certain software generates. Also the hex part of MK> the MSGID can be used to generate a real datetime stamp accurate to the MK> second and is vastly more informative than any so-called fix for the MK> obsolete MSG header's datetime stamp; MK> $ date --date="@$(printf "%d" 0x5fc6f369)" MK> Wed 02 Dec 2020 01:52:41 AM UTC That's a broken MSGID implementation, because it could be possible your system generates 2 (or more) messages in the same second (maybe automated ones). In that case there would be 2 (or more) different messages with the same MSGID... MK> ... A Møøse once bit my sister ... Illegal characters without a CHRS: kludge! (And yes I know mine isn't correct ;-)) Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 154/10 SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101 424 426 452 664 1016 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/2100 5138 5411 5832 5853 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 SEEN-BY: 288/100 292/8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 633/280 770/1 2454/119 PATH: 280/464 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]