TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A46
MSGID: 1:106/127 02b99ef1
TZUTC: 0000
On 01 Jan 2021, August Abolins said the following...
 AA> Offloading to an SD card would be sweet.
 AA> 
 AA> On my Blackberry, I can establish which storage device any app  
 AA> uses.  It's in the overall Settings section of the phone.  I  
 AA> don't really need the extra storage that an SD card offers, but  
 AA> decided to configure the camera to stash the pics onto the SD  
 AA> card. The document and music apps can be adjusted too.
 AA> 

Yeah. This particular phone, a    Motorola, doesn't allow moving apps to SD,
only photos, music etc.  I used to habe a Samsung or LG that allowed apps and
their storage to be on an SD card.  That would likely work better for me.

 AA>  CP> But there has always been complaints about changes to how
 AA>  CP> and where Fidonet traffic is.
 AA> 
 AA> I'm ok with that. Some initial complaints take the form of  
 AA> concern which are a form of inquiry.  But to kick up a dust storm  
 AA> with no suggestion that there are options for educational  
 AA> discussion is sad.
 AA> 

Unfortunately, you're going to have that. You'll never be able to please
everyone. 

 AA>  CP> "Privacy" concerns just seem to loom larger these days than
 AA>  CP> in the past.
 AA> 
 AA> There is no provision in Fido technology for privacy.  Everything  
 AA> is in the clear. The nature of echomail is open and public  
 AA> discussion.  The privacy in netmail is under the discretion of  
 AA> the sysop of the system it passes through - whether it be via  
 AA> email using Juno, a VPS hosted BBS somewhere or whatever.
 AA> 
 AA> But it may be true that a few more people are tuned to privacy  
 AA> concerns about any communications medium these days.
 AA> 
 AA> I'd say to those persons if you expect privacy and "control" of  
 AA> your messages, then don't participate in Fidonet.  :(
 AA> 
 AA> But I like the idea of the option of encrypted packets, and  
 AA> systems carrying the "ENC" flag.  That, at least is a good
 AA> indication that things don't necessarily have to remain blatantly  
 AA> in-the-clear if FTN systems are willing to cooperate.
 AA> 

I think that at least some of the privacy concerns are a matter of
perspective.

Yes, Fidonet is a public forum of sorts, but it is operated on private
systems by individuals. I would guess the privacy in most cases is more about
it being posted outside of Fidonet.  

Once the understanding that Telegram Groups aren't a "public" forum that
anyone can see, but have to be joined like a BBS does, those questions seemed
too go away.
 AA>  CP> Again, I still say it was a communication problem. I
 AA>  CP> remember Carol mentioning at least that the link was coming.
 AA>  CP> That's more than those echos you mention above did.
 AA> 
 AA> True. I got the moderator approvals, but the moderators did not  
 AA> say "wait until we make an announcement". A day or two later, I  
 AA> forwarded the info to Stas, and then a day or two later, Stas  
 AA> worked on getting feeds. The total time for all that took about a  
 AA> week for the 1st echo go live. I think it was nearly 2 weeks  
 AA> before one of the later echos went live.  If a moderator was  
 AA> concerned about communication there was plenty of time to achieve  
 AA> that in their own echo.  ;)   But none of the mods spoke up or  
 AA> raised concerns at the time.
 AA> 

The moderators obviously didn't have the concerns. Those came from
users/sysops that had no idea that the echos were going to be gated.

The moderators could have let their respective echos know beforehand,  That
way, those people with questions could voice them and they could be
addressed.Instead, they got the appearance of "Hey, this echo is being
broadcast on the internet now".  That's not actually the case, but it could
seem that way to people that do 't know what Telegram is.
 AA> But then, do you expect that every time a sysop changes to host  
 AA> their BBS on a new VPS and other "obviously commericial" servers?  
 AA> ;)

You wouldn't accept my argument that the Telegram Groups are a de facto BBS,
with Stas's bot being the mailer/tosser, but you're going to compare it to a
BBS changing hosts?

I'm just saying, although I see the Telegram groups linked to FTN Echos as a
type of BBS, it is still something not very well known to the BBS public.

I accept some responsibility as well. I was working on an article for
Fidonews or fidogazette or both, but my wifeps illness kept me from finishing
it.

 AA>  CP> Yes, there are going to be some users and even sysops
 AA>  CP> opposed to the idea, but they are free to no longer
 AA>  CP> participate in the echo if it bothers them that much.
 AA> 
 AA> Absolutely.  Freedom is wonderful.
 AA> 
 AA> I am enjoying the Fidonews postings from 30 year ago to  
 AA> comp.org.fidonet.  Man.. users and sysops really seemed to care  
 AA> about the progress of the hobby back then. In one of the latest  
 AA> issues was a concern to be expected to carry a specific echo and  
 AA> even the carry the Fidonews newsletter itself.
 AA> --

You still have people like that. And you have people that love their software
that they've used for decades and don't like change. Unfortunately, the later
group is far more vocal about it, at least in Z1 from what I can tell.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
 * Origin: theoasisbbs.ddns.net:1357 (1:106/127)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 106/127 120/340 123/131 124/5016
SEEN-BY: 153/757 154/10 203/0 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/101 424 426
SEEN-BY: 229/452 664 1016 1017 240/1120 2100 5138 5411 5832 5853 249/206
SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 280/464 5003 288/100 292/8125 310/31 317/3 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 770/1 2454/119
PATH: 106/127 221/6 154/10 280/464 240/5832 229/426