Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 7809  |
|  Maurice Kinal to August Abolins  |
|  MSGID  |
|  11 Apr 21 19:31:13  |
 
REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet ef514791
MSGID: 1:153/7001 60734e81
CHRS: UTF-8 4
-={ 2021-04-11 19:31:13.137413143+00:00 }=-
Hey August!
AA> Then the synchronet version adds some added uniqueness.
I disagree. The address itself is unique without adding any extra proprietary
bytes that are totally meaningless to the network at large. Any alterations
ought to be to the serial number portion.
Your suggestion is perfectly valid but to be honest I still believe that a
32-bit hex value for the unixtime or rfc-868 (seconds since 1900) is the best
choice for uniqueness over the longest span which is much greater than the 3
year period required by the current standard. Also it adds meaning to it
beyond what is capable for a randomly generated serial number. Unfortunetly
it has a shelf life that is quickly running out whereas the random one doesn't.
Life is good,
Maurice
... Wa bið þam þe sceal of langoþe leofes abidan.
Woe it is for the one who must wait in longing for the beloved.
--- GNU bash, version 5.1.4(1)-release (x86_64-motorshed-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 129/305 153/105
SEEN-BY: 153/135 757 802 7001 226/30 227/114 229/101 424 426 452 664
SEEN-BY: 229/700 1016 1017 240/5832 249/206 317 400 261/38 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 301/1 317/3 322/757 342/17 200 633/280
PATH: 153/7001 757 229/664 426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]