Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 7839  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Maurice Kinal  |
|  Re: anyway the wind blows  |
|  14 Apr 21 21:29:57  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0200 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 607744f7 REPLY: 1:153/7001 6076dd3e Hi Maurice, On 2021-04-14 12:17:02, you wrote to me: WvV>> It should take into account it can be called multiple times WvV>> within the same second. MK> Sure. How about this? MK> 6076da69-1689a348 MK> 6076da69-16bf0244 MK> ... It doesn't conform to the standard. WvV>> If you do that correctly, it's superior to the random one... MK> See above but just for fun I will do it side by side just like before. MK> 6076e0bd-22d50e70 n3yM8uFm MK> 6076e0bd-246302d4 sL4Irxdg MK> 6076e0bd-25d0d1f0 8fq4vU7e MK> 6076e0bd-276236a4 Aez4QZog MK> 6076e0bd-28f6291c jbQiqKYc MK> 6076e0bd-2a842704 gElrH3UT MK> 6076e0bd-2bf24d98 8qmyLLQR MK> 6076e0bd-2d8103dc Pbeaul1Z MK> 6076e0bd-2f0436d0 IHsKacHr MK> 6076e0bd-30a01b60 0An6jRkx MK> My best guesstimation is that the random one is superior given that it MK> doesn't require a rewrite of current FTN standards. It doesn't conform to the standard either... MK> However I do plan to change that and then for sure the unixtime based MK> one will be superior and unique for all time, nevermind 3 lousy years. I suggest you don't waist your time on fighting to get the existing standard changed. It's wasted energy. If you want a better unique identifier in ftn messages, create a new kludge (see my suggestion for the @UUID one, which needs a @RUID btw for replies), so you can do what you want, and make it as good as possible without having to consider existing software. Then write a proposal and convince software developers to implement it in their software. Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 129/305 SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101 424 426 452 664 SEEN-BY: 229/700 1016 1017 240/1120 2100 5138 5411 5824 5832 5853 SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 282/1038 288/100 292/8125 301/1 SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 SEEN-BY: 633/280 770/1 2454/119 PATH: 280/464 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]