TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes
TZUTC: 0200
CHRS: UTF-8 2
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
MSGID: 2:280/464 60784b01
REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet ef718475
Hi August,

On 2021-04-15 09:31:00, you wrote to me:

 AA>>> ;)  However, "may" is very clear.  :D

 WvV>> I beg to differ...

 AA> According to fta-1006, the definitions are clear. But
 AA> interestingly, the doc expired 20 years ago.  Why a definition
 AA> doc needs to expire (and not be replaced by something else)
 AA> alludes me.

I think I red somewhere that every ftsc document needs to be reviewed every 2
years... Maurice should know, he's a member! ;)

 AA>>> They're all just a bunch of 1's and 0's in the end.  It's
 AA>>> all the same stuff.  :D

 WvV>> But how we get there isn't...

 AA> Oh.. that's true enough.  But I've made my point. Assuming that
 AA> the serialno must be implemenet in hex is just that, an
 AA> assumption.

Well if most software expects a hex number, maybe the standard needs to be
reviewed, and worded more strict. ;)

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 129/305
SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101 424 426 452 664
SEEN-BY: 229/700 1016 1017 240/5832 249/110 206 317 400 280/464 5003
SEEN-BY: 282/1038 288/100 292/8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200
SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 770/1
PATH: 280/464 229/101 426