MSGID: 2:292/854 10173c0b
The US House of Representatives makes mincemeat of aircraft manufacturer
Boeing and aviation authority FAA in a parliamentary investigation into the
Boeing 737 MAX. Boeing went wrong in the design and development of the
aircraft, according to the Transportation Committee, while the FAA failed to
oversee the manufacturer and the certification.
 
In the 250-page parliamentary investigation report, delegates concluded that
the fatal crashes with Boeing 737 MAX aircraft from Lion Air and Ethiopian
Airlines are not due to a single defect, technical error or mismanagement.
 
They were the terrible sum of a series of erroneous technical assumptions by
Boeing engineers, a lack of transparency on the part of Boeing's management
and grossly inadequate oversight by the FAA.
 
Earlier this year it appeared that Boeing presented the new Maneuvering
Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) - the malfunctioning of which led
to the air disasters in 2018 and 2019 - as nothing more than an extension of
an existing system. In this way, the company wanted to avoid extra
certification costs and costly pilot training. The FAA has not intervened.
 
In a response, Boeing dons the fine cloth. "As a company, we have learned a
lot of hard lessons from the accidents with Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian
Airlines Flight 302 and the mistakes we made." As a company, the aircraft
manufacturer emphasizes that it has also made fundamental changes, which is
recognized in the report.
 
"Multiple committees, experts and government agencies have investigated
MAX-related issues, and we have incorporated many of their recommendations, as
well as the results of our own internal assessments, into the 737 MAX and the
overall aircraft design process," said Boeing.
 
Once the MAX is found safe by the FAA and other regulators and ready for use
again, it will be one of the most thoroughly researched aircraft ever,
according to Boeing. "We have complete confidence in its safety." The MAX,
which has been grounded worldwide since March 2019, may be allowed to fly
again at the end of this year.
 
The FAA states in a response that it will implement the improvements
recommended in the report. Parliamentarians have proposed reforms to
restructure the way the FAA oversees aircraft certification. A senate
committee will consider a reform bill on Wednesday.

--- DB4 - August 7 2020
 * Origin: AVIATION ECHO HQ (2:292/854)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 123/131 221/1 226/30 227/702 229/101 424
SEEN-BY: 229/426 664 240/5832 249/317 400 261/38 280/464 292/854 8125
SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 335/364 342/200 396/45 633/280 801/188
PATH: 292/854 229/426