Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 591  |
|  Rug Rat to Ward Dossche  |
|  Re: A Delta Boeing 737-900 loses part of  |
|  08 Jul 25 07:43:50  |
 MSGID: 1:135/250@fidonet 686d2097 PID: C-NET AMIGA BBS 5.36b WD> Boeing has been heavily criticised because they keep on adding things to WD> the 737-concept to increase payload and range but there is a limit, and WD> they have been pushing that limit for a while rather than diving into a WD> broad new design on a white sheet of paper. That may be the case, but the issue itself may not be Boeings esponsibility. The 739-ER entered service in 2007. Depending on when Delta took possesion the aircract may have already been through 1 D check. If there had been any other issues requiring the flap assembly to be worked on. How was it maintained the airlines from delivery to issue? The 737NG has been a reliable airframe. Though the MAX and the issue with the door plug have tainted the entire 737 line. Simmilar to the American DC10 crash in Chicago. The issue stemmed from impropper MX procedures that MD had on record of discouraging. Rug Rat (Brent Hendricks) Blog and Forums - www.catracing.org IMAGE BBS! 3.0 - bbs.catracing.org 6400 C-Net Amiga BBS - bbs.catracing.org 6840 --- CNet/5 * Origin: The Rat's Den BBS (1:135/250) SEEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 103/705 105/81 106/201 123/0 126 180 755 3001 SEEN-BY: 123/3002 124/5016 128/187 129/14 305 135/0 115 205 220 240 SEEN-BY: 135/250 363 385 390 391 153/757 7715 154/10 30 110 203/0 SEEN-BY: 218/700 221/0 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 317 400 426 SEEN-BY: 229/428 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 250/1 263/1 275/1000 280/464 SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5006 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 1321 770/1 902/26 3634/0 12 56 57 60 5020/400 SEEN-BY: 5020/8912 5054/30 5075/35 PATH: 135/250 115 3634/12 222/2 263/1 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]