Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.general    |    What goes on in exciting Arizona...    |    2,973 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,199 of 2,973    |
|    J.J.James to All    |
|    Why I'm tired of hearing about 'that' ci    |
|    23 Jun 14 23:07:29    |
      XPost: alt.homosexuality, alt.politics, alt.politics.obama       XPost: can.politics       From: fudge-packer@barackobama.com              (CNN) -- Here's a dirty little secret about the civil rights       movement:              A lot of Americans just don't want to hear about it anymore.              They find the subject dull or it makes them angry. Some African-       Americans don't want to hear stories about their parents getting       hit upside the head while singing "We Shall Overcome." And some       whites don't want to feel guilty.              The result? We treat the movement like broccoli: It's good for       us, we're told, but we shove it aside on our plates when no one       is looking.              I know. What I've just said is blasphemous. But I say it not out       of scorn, but concern. I was once a civil rights apostate who       sneaked out of rooms early to avoid holding hands and mumbling       along to "We Shall Overcome." Then I experienced a conversion.              I eventually wrote a book about the movement, and spent years       talking about the subject to interracial groups.              I was reminded of my conversion when I heard that a new civil       rights museum was opening in Atlanta on June 23, and that this       month activists would commemorate the 50th anniversary of a       dramatic civil rights campaign called Mississippi Freedom Summer.              I wish them well. I've learned through experience, though, that       civil rights museums and commemorations have a tough task.              During the years that I spoke publicly about civil rights, I       encountered three myths that do more damage to the movement than       "for white only" signs ever did.              No. 1: It was a black thang              I didn't go to a historically black college. I went to a       hysterically black school. I attended Howard University in       Washington, where the struggle of black America was drilled into       students' heads. When I was on campus, I used to see students       wearing T-shirts that unwittingly reflected a huge myth about       the movement. The T-shirts read:              "It's a black thang -- you wouldn't understand."              A quick word association test. When you hear the words civil       rights, what kind of faces do you see? Only black? As I talked       to various groups about the movement, I gradually realized that       it was primarily seen as a black struggle instead of an American       movement that helped all sorts of people.              It was a simplistic perception of the movement that someone on       National Public Radio recently described this way:              "Rosa sat down, Martin stood up, then the white folks saw the       light and saved the day."              It took me awhile to realize that white people were actually       part of the movement, not just as racists or rescuers.              http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/21/living/movement-       dull/?hpt=ob_articlefooter&iref=obnetwork              It didn't include faggots back then and it doesn't include       faggots now.              Faggots are not a protected class. They are degenerate       pedophiles.                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca