Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.general    |    What goes on in exciting Arizona...    |    2,977 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,411 of 2,977    |
|    Mississippi Mike to All    |
|    Apparently humans didn't come from "Afri    |
|    08 Nov 14 01:08:01    |
      XPost: ba.politics, dc.media, soc.penpals       XPost: alt.burningman       From: mmike@msu.edu              Anyone with any intelligence knows "africans" don't have any,       and aren't considered humans.              The existence of a mysterious ancient human lineage and the       genetic changes that separate modern humans from their closest       extinct relatives are among the many secrets now revealed in the       first high-quality genome sequence from a Neanderthal woman,       researchers say.              The Neanderthal woman whose toe bone was sequenced also reveals       inbreeding may have been common among her recent ancestors, as       her parents were closely related, possibly half-siblings or       another near relation.              Although modern humans are the world's only surviving human       lineage, others also once lived on Earth. These included       Neanderthals, the closest extinct relatives of modern humans,       and the relatively newfound Denisovans, whose genetic footprint       apparently extended from Siberia to the Pacific islands of       Oceania. Both Neanderthals and Denisovans descended from a group       that diverged from the ancestors of all modern humans. [See       Photos of Neanderthal Bone & Denisovan Fossils]              The first signs of Denisovans came from a finger bone and a       molar tooth discovered in Denisova Cave in southern Siberia in       2008. To learn more about Denisovans, scientists examined a       woman's toe bone, which was unearthed in the cave in 2010 and       showed physical features resembling those of both Neanderthals       and modern humans. The fossil is thought to be about 50,000       years old, and slightly older than previously analyzed Denisovan       fossils.              Human interbreeding              The scientists focused mostly on the fossil's nuclear DNA, the       genetic material from the chromosomes in the nucleus of the cell       that a person receives from both their mother and father. They       also examined the genome of this fossil's mitochondria the       powerhouses of the cell, which possess their own DNA and get       passed down solely from the mother.              The investigators completely sequenced the fossil's nuclear DNA,       with each position (or nucleotide) sequenced an average of 50       times. This makes the sequence's quality at least as high as       that of genomes sequenced from present-day people.              The genetic analysis revealed the toe bone belonged to a       Neanderthal. When compared with other Neanderthal mitochondrial       DNA samples, this newfound fossil's closest known relatives are       Neanderthals found in Mezmaiskaya Cave in the Caucasus Mountains       about 2,100 miles (3,380 kilometers) away.              These findings helped the scientists refine the human family       tree, further confirming that different human lineages       interbred. They estimated about 1.5 to 2.1 percent of DNA of       people outside Africa are Neanderthal in origin, while about 0.2       percent of DNA of mainland Asians and Native Americans is       Denisovan in origin.              "Admixture seems to be common among human groups," said study       lead author Kay Prüfer, a computational geneticist at the Max       Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig,       Germany.              Intriguingly, the scientists discovered that apparently       Denisovans interbred with an unknown human lineage, getting as       much as 2.7 to 5.8 percent of their genomes from it. This       mystery relative apparently split from the ancestors of all       modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans between 900,000 years       and 4 million years ago, before these latter groups started       diverging from each other.              This enigmatic lineage could even potentially be Homo erectus,       the earliest undisputed predecessor of modern humans. There are       no signs this unknown group interbred with modern humans or       Neanderthals, Prüferadded. [The 10 Biggest Mysteries of the       First Humans]              "Some unknown archaic DNA might have caught a ride through time       by living on in Denisovans until we dug the individual up and       sequenced it," Prüfertold LiveScience. "It opens up the prospect       to study the sequence of an archaic (human lineage) that might       be out of reach for DNA sequencing."              Interbreeding took place between Neanderthals and Denisovans as       well. These new findings suggest at least 0.5 percent of the       Denisovan genome came from Neanderthals. However, nothing of the       Denisovan genome has been detected in Neanderthals so far.              In addition, "the age of the Neanderthals and Denisovans we       sequenced also doesn't allow us to say whether any gene flow       from modern humans to Neanderthals or Denisovans happened,"       Prüfer said. The Neanderthals and Denisovans that researchers       have sequenced the DNA of to date "probably lived at a time when       no modern humans were around," he explained.              Modern humans' distinguishing features              It remains uncertain when modern humans, Neanderthals and       Denisovans diverged from one another. The researchers currently       estimate modern humans split from the common ancestors of all       Neanderthals and Denisovans between 550,000 and 765,000 years       ago, and Neanderthals and Denisovans diverged from each other       between 381,000 and 473,000 years ago.              Genetic analysis revealed the parents of the woman whose toe       bone they analyzed were closely related possibly half-       siblings, or an uncle and niece, or an aunt and nephew, or a       grandfather and granddaughter, or a grandmother and grandson.       Inbreeding among close relatives was apparently common among the       woman's recent ancestors. It remains uncertain as to whether       inbreeding was some kind of cultural practice among these       Neanderthals or whether it was unavoidable due to how few       Neanderthals apparently lived in this area, Prüfer said.              By comparing modern human, Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes,       the researchers identified more than 31,000 genetic changes that       distinguish modern humans from Neanderthals and Denisovans.       These changes may be linked with the survival and success of       modern humans a number have to do with brain development.              "If one speculates that we modern humans carry some genetic       changes that enabled us to develop technology to the degree we       did and settle in nearly all habitable areas on the planet, then       these must be among those changes," Prüfer said. "It is hard to       say what exactly these changes do, if anything, and it will take       the next few years to find out whether hidden among all these       changes are some that helped us modern humans to develop       sophisticated technology and settle all over the planet."              Prüfer and his colleagues detailed their findings in the Dec. 19       issue of the journal Nature.                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca