Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.general    |    What goes on in exciting Arizona...    |    2,973 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,500 of 2,973    |
|    Ernest Cruikshank to All    |
|    Will World Chaos Sink the Dems?    |
|    09 Nov 14 22:15:01    |
      XPost: ba.politics, dc.media, soc.penpals       XPost: alt.burningman       From: cruikshanke@yahoo.com              Voters’ unhappiness with President Obama’s response to global       threats could drag down state and congressional Democrats this       November—and give the GOP some big wins.              Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared that Russian       troops could take Kiev in two weeks. The bloodthirsty militants       of ISIS have beheaded another American journalist and control       territory from Syria to the gates of Baghdad. And although the       upcoming midterm elections may appear to be focused on domestic       policy concerns like health care and the economy, the growing       anxiety over President Obama’s handling of global events seems       to be weighing down his job approval rating—and, by extension,       Democratic chances in the fall.              Between the bad optics of ill-timed golf rounds and a too-candid       admission that we “don’t have a strategy yet” to deal with ISIS       in Syria, Obama’s underwhelming leadership on international       affairs has attracted a lot of criticism in recent weeks. And       while he says he’ll lay out more details of his plan to deal       with global threats on Wednesday, voters are growing less and       less convinced that Obama is up to the task of leading us       through uncertain times in a dangerous world.              Obama’s second term has been largely characterized by gridlock       and disappointment on the domestic policy front. Still, voters       don’t hold him entirely responsible for this fact—Congress       averages a job approval rating that’s barely above 10 percent,       and Republicans shoulder more blame for last year’s government       shutdown than do Obama and the Democrats. And while voters have       long been unimpressed with the president’s handling of issues       like the economy and health care, they seem no more upset with       him over these things than they were in his first term. His       health care law is roughly as unpopular today as it was in       September 2010, and his 40 percent approval rating on the health       care issue is essentially unchanged from where it was four years       ago (PDF).              The key difference between 2010 and today is that, back then,       about half of Americans still approved of the job Obama was       doing overall (PDF). That’s because, despite whatever qualms       they had about Obamacare and a lackluster recovery, four years       ago many voters still thought Obama was dealing with the rest of       the world in the right way and keeping us safe, and gave him       credit for that.              Now Obama’s overall job approval sags in the low 40s.       Disapproval is regularly 10 or more points higher than approval,       and a likely reason for this is plunge in popularity among       voters is the president’s foreign policy. What was once the       bright spot in the president’s otherwise lackluster polling       numbers is now the anchor pulling him down. In fact, a recent       poll shows only 31 percent of American voters saying they       approve of the job the president is doing on foreign policy, a       number that lags behind his overall approval rating—and his       approval rating on the economy and health care, his two primary       weak spots throughout his presidency.              It would appear foreign policy is not going to be the deciding       issue in the 2014 midterms. Fewer than 4 out of 10 voters say       that foreign policy is a “very important” issue in determining       how they vote this year (PDF). And of course international       relations and national security fall much more squarely in the       executive branch, making congressional and statewide elections a       poor venue for hashing out debates about the right approach to       taking on ISIS or Vladimir Putin.              But if Americans are increasingly upset with how the president       is handling foreign policy, and it continues to weigh down his       overall job approval, it not only makes him a less effective       advocate on the campaign trail—it makes voters less likely to       want to vote to give him a friendlier Congress. The argument       that voters ought to get rid of the Republicans so that Obama       can have his way is a lot more potent when Obama is at 50       percent job approval than when he’s below 40. A president with       job approval in the low 40s is a much less appealing campaign       trail sidekick than one who is in the 50s.              What Obama’s response ought to be to the likes to Putin or ISIS       isn’t something that can be divined from polling, nor should it       be. It’s not clear exactly what actions he could take that would       improve his foreign policy job approval rating and, in turn, his       overall job approval, though fewer rounds of golf might be a       start.              Voters simultaneously express war-weariness and growing concern       about the spectre of radical Islam that is haunting the Middle       East. They think it’s good that we got out of Iraq, but don’t       think we should just keep to ourselves while ISIS expands its       reach. Moreover, they aren’t sure how we should deal with a       bellicose Russian government that is advancing westward and       backs rebel groups that shot down a civilian passenger aircraft,       or how to stop a savage group of rapists and murderers that are       trying to establish a caliphate, or how to handle a brutal       dictator who has used chemical weapons on civilians. But they do       know that a president saying “We don’t have a strategy” isn’t       comforting, and doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence.              Despite global unrest, the 2014 election may not be a “foreign       policy election” in the strictest sense. But deepening fear       about growing bad news abroad is diminishing Americans’ views of       the president at home, and that’s bad news for Democrats this       November.              http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/09/will-world-       chaos-sink-the-dems.html                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca