XPost: ba.politics, dc.media, soc.penpals   
   XPost: alt.burningman   
   From: obama@sucks.com   
      
   Obama actually calls Ronald Reagan a “wild eyed socialist”.   
   Imagine this claim being made about the ardent anti-communist   
   who once famously called the Soviet Union the – Evil Empire and   
   he once joked, to a radio technician during a traditional   
   presidential radio address in August 1984, “My fellow Americans,   
   I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that   
   will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.”   
      
   However, Obama is now getting in bed with the Soviets. And they   
   are still the Soviets and should be considered a dangerous enemy   
   seeking to take down the United States. Recall the recent   
   “Russian Spy” case? In fact, the US is now completely dependent   
   on our enemy, the Soviets, to transport our American astronauts   
   into space. That is a brilliant move that certainly will not   
   have an adverse impact on America.   
      
   I was stationed in Germany in 1984 (rather ironic—the same year   
   I read the book 1984) with the 127th Military Police Corp.   
   Personally I thought Reagan’s statement was really funny, though   
   some, especially the Soviets, were not laughing. Basically the   
   comment launched the military on high alert, which meant we all   
   grabbed our weapons and were waiting for the word to move out.   
      
   My thought about going on alert was that I could not wait to go   
   kill some commies. But, fortunately or unfortunately depending   
   on your perspective of war, everyone regained their senses,   
   pulled their panties out of their crack and took a chill pill.   
   Besides, the Soviets knew we could smoke them.   
      
   But can you imagine Barack Obama making a statement like Reagan   
   to the current Soviet regime led by Vladimir Putin (former KGB   
   officer)? Most definitely not. However there is a distinct   
   probability that Obama would make a joke talking to Putin over   
   the phone where Obama promises that ‘America will not stand in   
   the way when Iran begins bombing Israel…Vlad -- let the bombing   
   begin buddy’. I can envision Obama saying that.   
      
   Unfortunately listening to Obama lie and distort facts is an   
   extremely tedious task given the fact that when I joined the   
   military, under Ronald Reagan, we marched, ran, slept, bled,   
   sweated, ate and learned to kill, break things and blow stuff up   
   -- all while chanting little ditties about “killing commies for   
   mommy”.   
      
   The irony is chilling though, because now I’m required to   
   “respect” an American president that IS a commie. It is   
   unsettling to say the least. However, what is more unsettling is   
   the number of Americans that will vote for this treasonous   
   communist again in 2012.   
      
   Another troubling issue is when Obama attempts to re-write   
   history by claiming President Ronald Reagan promoted the same   
   tax policy as Obama. Obama of course is referring to the so-   
   called Buffet Rule. But this is something of principle that I   
   simply cannot permit Obama’s allegation to go unchallenged.   
      
   My other articles argued that China and terrorism are not the   
   real threat to United States security. Instead the true threat   
   to America is, remains and has always been the Soviet Union. The   
   mere fact that the Soviets are operating under a quasi-   
   private/public capitalist economic model coupled with a   
   socialist style political government operating model, does not   
   mean they are friendly to American interests.   
      
   Hence, when the President of the United States, Barack Obama,   
   tells a Russian leader that his hands are tied due to his re-   
   election campaign, but he will be more “flexible” after his re-   
   election, is not a statement that Ronald Reagan would make.   
      
   My first thought when I heard Vladimir Obama utter his little   
   sweet nothings to Soviet President Medvedev about being more   
   flexible to do what with the Russians? Are Obama and Putin   
   getting a hotel room to “spoon?” It certainly couldn’t be that   
   Obama was going to subjugate himself to the will of Putin and   
   the Soviet government? The likelihood of that happening is like   
   that of Clinton giving top secret military rocket technology to   
   the Chinese.   
      
   For those readers out of the loop – Clinton did actually give   
   the Chinese top secret missile technology because they could not   
   keep a satellite in sky. Apparently Clinton was worried about   
   space Chinese satellite debris hitting innocent Americans.   
      
   And for those of you unfamiliar with the Soviet Union, Putin is   
   a former KGB officer. The KGB is not a social club that someone   
   just quits, just like when a CIA officer leaves – they are   
   always CIA and the only way you leave is “toes up”. So to think   
   that Russia’s desires have faded in their efforts to return as a   
   super power, and become the dominate global super power, is like   
   assuming that Obama is a conservative capitalist that desires to   
   see the United States continue to reign as the world’s only   
   super power.   
      
   Think of all the actions taken by Obama and then attempt to   
   convince any semi-conscious relatively intelligent American that   
   Obama is not a communist. The following instances, when put   
   together in context, will eliminate any doubt that Obama is a   
   Communist working against the interests of the United States.   
      
   Unfortunately, there are also around 80 to 100 members of   
   Congress that are also Communists that must also be tried for   
   treason, predicated on their usurpation of their oath of office   
   taken in which they swear to “protect and defend the   
   Constitution” from enemies both foreign and domestic.   
      
   Of course many readers are thinking I’m a crazy un-American   
   Obama hater, for calling the President Obama a communist. All   
   democrats will say it is insulting to the President of the   
   United States for an American to call the President a communist.   
   But me thinks they protest too much.   
      
   However the presidency in not about a particular man, it is much   
   bigger than the man and if the man holding the office of the   
   Presidency betrays the responsibility of the office then he   
   shall be held to account.   
      
   The reality is that Obama has usurped his oath of office. The   
   presidency is not about protecting one man, the presidency is a   
   reflection of the foundation and meaning of America. Thus,   
   anyone, even the president, that violates the constitutional   
   tenants established by law, is guilty of treason and must   
   therefore be held accountable.   
      
   In proving that Obama is a communist and as such has committed   
   treason requires a definition of the term usurpation? According   
   to dictionary usurpation is: “A wrongful seizure or exercise of   
   authority or privilege belonging to another; an encroachment:"in   
   our own day, gross usurpations upon the liberty of private   
   life"(John Stuart Mill).”   
      
   According to Article II Section I, prescribes the Presidential   
   oath of office as: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will   
   faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,   
   and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend   
   the Constitution of the United States."   
      
   In addition to the Presidential oath, each new session of   
   Congress begins with the recitation of the oath of office in   
   which congressional members declare: “I do solemnly swear (or   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)