Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.general    |    What goes on in exciting Arizona...    |    2,973 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,791 of 2,973    |
|    Still No Birth Certificate to All    |
|    It's Final -- Corn Ethanol Is Of No Use     |
|    24 Dec 14 09:14:53    |
      [continued from previous message]              What else can we use to produce biofuel?              Two leading strategies involve ethanol production from the       degradation of cellulosics, and biodiesel production from algae.              The common alcohol, ethanol, has been harnessed by humans for       millennia, made through the microbial conversion of biomass       materials, typically sugars, through fermentation. The process       starts with a solution of fermentable sugars, fermented to       ethanol by microbes, and then the ethanol is separated and       purified by distillation.              Fermentation involves microorganisms, typically yeasts, that       evolved billions of years ago before Earth’s atmosphere       contained oxygen, to use sugars for food and in the process       produced ethanol, CO2 and other byproducts:              (sugar) C6H12O6 ? 2 CH3CH2OH + 2 CO2 (ethanol + carbon       dioxide)              Microorganisms typically use 6-carbon sugars and their       precursors, glucose and sucrose. But because sugars and starches       are foods, a better alternative for ethanol production should be       from non-food cellulosic materials, such as paper, cardboard,       wood, and other fibrous plant material. Switchgrass and napier       grass have been studied extensively as the best alternatives.              Cellulosics are abundant and much of the supply is considered       waste. Cellulosics are comprised of lignin, hemicellulose, and       cellulose. Lignin provides structural support for the plant and       encloses the cellulose and hemicellulose molecules, making it       more difficult to process for fuel.              Thus, efficiently making ethanol out of cellulosics requires a       different approach than for corn. They can either be reacted       with acid (sulfuric is most common), degraded using enzymes       produced from microbes, or heated to a gas and reacted with       chemical catalysts (thermo-chemical). Each has its variations,       some can be combined, and all are attempting to be       commercialized. Still, these processes are stuck at about twice       the price per gallon produced compared to corn. Recently,       special microorganisms have been genetically engineered to       ferment these materials into ethanol with relatively high       efficiency.              It’s no wonder we just went with corn!              Another less discussed biofuel strategy is biodiesel replacing       petroleum diesel. Biodiesel is made by combining almost any oil       or fat with an alcohol such as ethanol or methanol.              Biodiesel can be run in any diesel engine without modification       and produces less toxic emissions and particulates than       petroleum diesel. It causes less wear and tear on engines, and       increases lubricity and engine efficiency, and releases about       60% less CO2 emissions than petroleum diesel.              Rudolf Diesel originally developed the diesel engine to run on       diesel from food oils such as peanut and soybean, but animal       fats and any other natural oil can be used. However, almost a       hundred years ago, the need for fuel outstripped the supply of       natural oils and petroleum become the only abundant source       available.              The most common natural oils used are rapeseed and canola oil,       but a particularly promising candidate is oil from algae. Algae       production uses non-productive land and brine water and produces       over 20 times the oil production of any food crop. An acre of       algae can produce almost 5,000 gallons of biodiesel. It does not       compete with food crops for arable land or potable water and       could produce over 60 billion gallons/yr that would replace all       petroleum-based diesel in the U.S.              However, all algae production facilities presently sell their       crops to the food and cosmetic industry at a much greater profit       than they would get from the fuel industry.              I guess for biofuels, as for any other source, there’s just no       such thing as a free lunch.              [Note: Thanks to Eric and other commenters for pointing out some       errors, especially my failing to mention the tax credits and       tariffs have expired]                     http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/04/20/its-final-corn-       ethanol-is-of-no-use/                             --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca