Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    az.general    |    What goes on in exciting Arizona...    |    2,973 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,214 of 2,973    |
|    Martha Stewart Went To Jail For Muc to All    |
|    Eight Laws Hillary Clinton Could Be Indi    |
|    18 Jan 16 22:24:18    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv.news.oreilly-factor, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, a       t.vietnam.veterans       XPost: soc.culture.soviet       From: multiple.felonies@hillaryclinton.com              As a former Justice Department official, I have, of late, been       asked by both Democratic and Republican friends whether Hillary       Clinton could be indicted for her email related actions. The       simple answer is yes — she, and perhaps some of her senior       staff, could be indicted for violating a number of federal       criminal statutes. But for reasons that will be discussed later,       it is unlikely that she will be.              Nevertheless, it is well worth discussing the various criminal       provisions of federal law that she and others may have been       violated based on mainstream news reports. Remember that news       reporting can be incorrect or incomplete — and that Hillary       Clinton, and anyone else involved, deserves every presumption of       innocence. Also keep in mind that an indictment is not a       conviction but rather the informed opinion of a grand jury that       probable cause exists to believe one or more violations of       federal criminal statutes have transpired.              This intellectual and legal research exercise should commence       with a brief review of the basics of criminal jurisprudence:       There are two elements of a criminal offense: the prohibited       conduct as defined in statute; and the mens rea or mental intent       of the individual or individuals engaging in the prohibited       conduct. Thus, to gain a conviction on a criminal count in an       indictment, a prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt       that: (1) the prohibited conduct occurred, (2) the prohibited       conduct was undertaken by the defendant, and (3) the defendant       had the requisite mens rea or intent at the time.              1.) 18 U.S. Code § 793 – Gathering, transmitting or losing       defense information       18 U.S. Code § 798 – Disclosure of classified information              A federal prosecutor would naturally focus first on the most       serious allegations: willfully transmitting or willfully       retaining Top Secret and Compartmented (TS/SCI) material using a       private server system. The individual who transmits and the       individual who receives and retains TS/SCI information on a       private server jointly share the culpability for risking the       compromise and exploitation of the information by hostile       intelligence services. The prosecutor’s charging document would       likely include felony counts under 18 U.S. Code § 793 and under       18 U.S. Code § 798 against each transmitting individual as well       as separate counts against each receiving and retaining       individual. Violation of either provision of the U.S. Code cited       above is a felony with a maximum prison term of ten years.              The prohibited conduct is the insecure transmission of highly       classified information, as well as the receipt and retention of       highly classified information in an unapproved manner. The       requisite mens rea is the willful commission of the prohibited       conduct and the knowledge that compromised information could       result in prejudice or injury to the United States or advantage       to any foreign nation. Proof of intent to disclose the       classified information is not required.              2.) U.S. Code § 1924 – Unauthorized removal and retention of       classified documents or material              If the federal prosecutors are of a charitable disposition and       an accused person has been cooperative, the felony charges under       18 U.S. Code § 793 and 18 U.S. Code § 798 may be “pled-down” to       a single or to multiple misdemeanor counts under 18 U.S. Code §       1924. A misdemeanor conviction would probably result in a period       of probation and a less significant fine. The prohibited conduct       is the unauthorized removal of classified information from       government control or its retention in an unauthorized location.       The mens rea required is the intent to remove from government       control or the intent to store the classified information in an       unauthorized location.                     3.) 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b) — Concealment, removal, or mutilation       generally              To sustain a charge under 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b), a federal       prosecutor need only prove that the accused transferred and held       the only copies of official government records (whether       classified or not), the very existence of which was concealed       from government records custodians. The mens rea required is       that an accused knows that official government records were       transferred or removed from the control of government records       custodians. Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b) is a felony with       a maximum prison term of three years.              4.) 18 U.S. Code § 641 – Public money, property or records              Again, if the federal prosecutors are of a charitable       disposition and accused has been cooperative, the felony charges       under 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b) can be “pled down” to a misdemeanor       under 18 U.S. Code § 641. The prohibited conduct is the       conversion of official records (whether classified or not) to       the accused’s exclusive use and the mens rea is simply the       intent to do so. Conviction on the lesser misdemeanor charge       would likely result in a period of probation and the imposition       of a fine.              5.) 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before       departments, agencies, and committees              If it can be proven that an accused destroyed, withheld, or       concealed the existence of official records being sought under       subpoena by a committee of Congress, the accused can be       convicted of obstruction under 18 U.S. Code § 1505. The       prohibited conduct includes destruction, concealment and       withholding of documents, thereby impeding or obstructing the       committee’s rightful pursuit of information. The mens rea is       knowledge of the committee’s interest in obtaining the official       records in the accused’s custody or control. Violation of 18       U.S. Code § 1505 is a felony with a maximum prison term of five       years.              6.) 18 U.S. Code § 1519 — Destruction, alteration, or       falsification of records in federal investigations              If it can be proven that an accused knowingly concealed the       existence of official records being sought by the Department of       State Inspector General (DOS/IG) or by the Federal Bureau of       Investigation (FBI), such accused can be convicted of       obstruction. The prohibited conduct is the concealment and       withholding of documents that impede or obstruct an       investigation. The mens rea is the intent to conceal or       withhold. Violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1519 is a felony with a       maximum prison term of twenty years.              7.) 18 U.S. Code § 1031 — Fraud against the United States       18 U.S. Code § 1343 – Fraud by wire, radio or television       18 U.S. Code § 1346 — Definition of “scheme or artifice to       defraud”       18 U.S. Code § 371 – Conspiracy to defraud the United States              If it can be proven that an accused arranged for the Department       of State to hire an Information Technology (IT) specialist to       primarily administer and maintain a private server system owned       by the accused, then the accused can be convicted of conspiracy       to commit honest services fraud and probably wire fraud. The       prohibited conduct is having the United States pay an employee       salary and/or official travel funds for performing private              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca